GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Vararam-vs-MIT Air Intake & Powerbond UDP G-Tech results on a 6.2

Old Mar 6, 2012 | 03:55 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Default Vararam-vs-MIT Air Intake & Powerbond UDP G-Tech results on a 6.2

Here are my updated g-tech results on a 2011 xtd cab z71 4x4 with the 6.2 and 3.42 gears running on 17” factory alloys and running in 4 auto. The fixed mods (not listed below) are diablosport diablo (92 octane) tune, ported stock throttle body, 2” leveling kit, and soft tonneau cover. I do not have a good baseline on my stock truck as I just recently learned to launch in 4 auto for better and more consistent times.

14.46 @ 98.1 mph (avg of 4 runs) with MIT & modified stock air box, NO UDP
14.62 @ 97.2 mph (avg of 3 runs) with Vararam air intake, NO UDP
14.24 @ 99.4 mph (avg of 3 runs) with Vararam air intake & Powerbond UDP
14.04 @ 100.7 mph (avg of 2 runs) with MIT, modified stock airbox, & Powerbond UDP


I have found that I also lose 1 to 1.5 mpg by running the Vararam intake so it is off for good...anyone want to buy it? (ha! ha!) I am also getting an in person Black Bear tune over the weekend (in Sacramento) so I will report my G-tech & MPG results from that as well. Don’t bash on the G-tech as it is a very good tool to compare mods. It’s pretty safe to say that the trap speeds from the g-tech are a 2-3 mph high. One more quick thing to note is that I removed my nerf bars at the same time I installed my UDP so there is probably a slight improvement from removing the 50lbs or so.

I hope that someone finds this helpful.

Last edited by v8hunter; Mar 7, 2012 at 12:16 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

Informative and kinda confirms what I already suspected. Definitely looking forward to your results with the MIT/Modded Stock Airbox/& UDP.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:22 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Default

I put the MIT and modded stock airbox back on the truck tonight. I'll give it a few days to adjust and then see where I am at compared to my previous runs.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:27 PM
  #4  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Launch in 4hi not auto, its very hard on the tcase clutch packs launching in 4auto on concrete.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 12:09 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Default

Thanks for the launch tip...wish I would have known before I made 2 more runs this morning...see updated results in original post.

My results this morning tell me pretty much what I was expecting with the MIT & modified stock airbox. The thing that blows me away is how I got about 4 tenths faster with the UDP. My only justification is that the truck comes off the line substantially quicker as the launch was/is the weak point of my truck with its 3.42 gears since the UDP gives you a little more power through the whole powerband rather than just mid/top end like most mods. There is also one more thing to note is that I removed my factory nerf bars (maybe 50 lbs) since the UDP install so that probably is worth about 1/2 of a tenth.

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Launch in 4hi not auto, its very hard on the tcase clutch packs launching in 4auto on concrete.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 01:15 PM
  #6  
8UALIVE's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Winfield, AL
Default

Originally Posted by v8hunter
Thanks for the launch tip...wish I would have known before I made 2 more runs this morning...see updated results in original post.

My results this morning tell me pretty much what I was expecting with the MIT & modified stock airbox. The thing that blows me away is how I got about 4 tenths faster with the UDP. My only justification is that the truck comes off the line substantially quicker as the launch was/is the weak point of my truck with its 3.42 gears since the UDP gives you a little more power through the whole powerband rather than just mid/top end like most mods. There is also one more thing to note is that I removed my factory nerf bars (maybe 50 lbs) since the UDP install so that probably is worth about 1/2 of a tenth.
I'm guessing your air sucks out there huh?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 10:41 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Default

I live pretty close to sea level with temps for the runs listed at 35-50 degrees so the air density for those runs is about as good as it gets.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 11:01 PM
  #8  
8UALIVE's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Winfield, AL
Default

Originally Posted by v8hunter
I live pretty close to sea level with temps for the runs listed at 35-50 degrees so the air density for those runs is about as good as it gets.
The reason I ask is as u can see in my sig my truck is a ccsb and with just a tune I ran a 9.00 (13.99) and that was on a 87 tune. My brother ran a 8.90 (13.83) on denali 20's and his was on 93 tune. Both tuned with HP Tuners. Same gears, nothing different from mine but wheels. I put the vararam CAI on my truck and now I beat him by a truck and a half. So I'm guessing I will run a 8.80 or .85 now which is about a 13.70-.75. Also my truck picked up about 1 mpg with the vararam and my buddy's truck picked up 1.5mpg with it as well. I'm not by any means calling you a liar I was just comparing trucks and locations. I wonder how accurate that G-Tech is...? When will you be able to take it to the track and see what it runs? You need to bring it to Alabama!! Lol
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 11:23 PM
  #9  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Are you using 1/8 mile times to calculate your 1/4 mile times? Those formulas don't work well on heavy 4x4 trucks with the aerodynamics of a house.

The OP wasn't claiming a 1/4 mile time. He was just using the meter as a tool to directly compare a couple of mods to each other.

Just sayin...
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 11:30 PM
  #10  
8UALIVE's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Winfield, AL
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
Are you using 1/8 mile times to calculate your 1/4 mile times? Those formulas don't work well on heavy 4x4 trucks with the aerodynamics of a house.

The OP wasn't claiming a 1/4 mile time. He was just using the meter as a tool to directly compare a couple of mods to each other.

Just sayin...
Yeah, but I have seen trucks that ran in the 1/8 and their 1/4 time is almost right on with what I'm figuring. Yeah I know he wasn't really posting 1/4 mile times, that's why I was wondering how accurate that thing is. I really am impressed with the udp difference tho....! Might be something I look into with my cam/headers install... Hope I didnt offend the OP, wasn't trying to.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.