GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Upgraded to new 6.2....school me on these motors

Old Mar 27, 2011 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default Upgraded to new 6.2....school me on these motors

As soon as I learned that Chevy let you get the 6.2 in LT trim, I knew I had to trade my '09 which I just did yesterday. What an option for 2k: upgrade to 6.2, 6L80E, 14 bolt rear, and disc brakes in the rear. I couldn't find what a really wanted (EC, Black, Silver or Taupe) but am happy with the truck I found.

Ok, I know these 6.2s have the cam phaser and Comp Cams has a few cams for them already. I will look more into this down the road but for now I want headers and a tune. I've seen some posts where people mention that catbacks are a possible waste of $$$. Does the stock catback flow that well? Also, of the 4 headers for our trucks (Dynatech, ARH, Kooks, SW) which ones are compatible with 4wd? I know the dynatech are for sure but am not sure about the others. Also looking at their websites some don't seem to specify if there is a 6.2 specific header. I think 1 7/8" would probably be the best for more hp/tq without raising the powerband, no? Which brings me to my next question: what kind of tuning issues are there with the 6.2? It would suck to not get the full benefit of headers if tuners are still trying to get this motor figured out. Basically, I want to start of with headers and a dynotune then down the road do a cam and retune. I want to keep the powerband similar to factory since this is a truck but figure 400rwhp with peak power in the 5500-5800 range should be doable with no loss down low.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 07:23 PM
  #2  
Allgonoshow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Default

There should be no fit issues with 4x4 headers.

There is some debate on 1 7/8 vs 1 3/4, I choose 1 7/8 on ARH'S advise for 6.2.
I don't find any loss of low end torque or power but haven't proved it on a dyno.
The oe muffler does have chambers and baffles and 2.5 inch inner tubes, so cat backs should improve performance.
Also, headers and catback equals LOUD

Most good tuners will tune for your set up especially on a dyno.

Enjoy your new truck.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #3  
blackvmax07's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Pearland
Default

congrats on the new truck, how much did u get it for if u dont mind me askin
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 08:27 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

Originally Posted by blackvmax07
congrats on the new truck, how much did u get it for if u dont mind me askin
Sticker was 42.5k drove out for 34.8k including TTL.

It was the only LT 4x4 L9H on the lot.

Last edited by 91Z28; Mar 27, 2011 at 08:36 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 08:56 PM
  #5  
slammed89swb's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook Tx
Default

Congrats on the new ride, pics?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

Originally Posted by slammed89swb
Congrats on the new ride, pics?








And a comparison window sticker wise between my old and new truck. Both had about 600 worth of dealer installed options also (vin etch and tint). Mileage on the '09 was 14/19 and the '11 is 12/18.



Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #7  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

Nice- yer gonna love it. I still hafta tune mine..........
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
mikeith's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: lubbock, tx
Default

no tune on mine yet but it does need one! been in ones that have tune and you will be amazed at how much just that makes a difference on the 6.2. plant on doing headers and an e-cutout aswell. call me lame but i dont care for my dd to be all loud and stuff anymore
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 07:46 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 2001 Sierra
Nice- yer gonna love it. I still hafta tune mine..........
One thing I've already noticed is that the 6.2/6L80E/3.42 is much stronger off the line than the 5.3/4L60E/3.73 truck was. The dealership filled it up with 87 so I'll keep it somewhat mellow until about 500 miles are on there and I have it filled with 93 or E85.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 08:25 AM
  #10  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

that's right- the 6.2 is not labored at all. It's also head and shoulders above the 6.0 LQ9 as the heads- which you've prolly heard all about are decendants of the LS7, the combustion chambers are just the schizzle...........
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.