Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

headers tune/MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2011, 12:35 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,516
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default headers tune/MPG

How many here did long tubes and a tune and kept there fuel mileage?
My 6.2 bone stock got very decent mileage,since ive done ARH and a PG tune the mileage dropped by 3mpg city and hwy.And yes I was babying it,light throttle slow starts.I then went with a jesse bubb tune.Pretty much the same results,performance of the two are close,I picked up maybe 1-2 MPH on a marked stretch of road appox 1/4 mile with ARH and tune over stock.

Past trucks have gained or stayed close to the same mileage with header/tune mods.

I know some will say DYNO TUNE, well both tuners looked at logs and said its fine.In the past I have had good luck with email tunes/logs
Old 03-24-2011, 01:42 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
CDN SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just a thought .but if your long tubes are large diameter then you definitely moved the torque band up inthe rpm range and to get that truck moving needs all the torque you can get down low ......less torque down low meand more throttle position to get it moving FWIW
Old 03-24-2011, 02:50 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm gonna disagree. I would wager that there has been no loss in low end torque.

Camaro dyno comparing 1&3/4", 1&7/8", 2".
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...light=ARH+dyno

Gonzo I guess I'm gonna be the guy suggesting a dyno tune lol.
Old 03-24-2011, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
CDN SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert91RS
I'm gonna disagree. I would wager that there has been no loss in low end torque.

Camaro dyno comparing 1&3/4", 1&7/8", 2".
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...light=ARH+dyno

Gonzo I guess I'm gonna be the guy suggesting a dyno tune lol.
No problem you may be correct in this situation just a thought and what I have seen on race engine dyno testing many times ......I looked quickly at the dyno graph ....since we move the truck from off idle to say 3k in normal driving did the headers have more torque down there than the manifolds ? that was my point not sure if that shown on those dyno charts
Old 03-24-2011, 03:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I definitely lost low end with my headers over stock manifolds, but really picked up middle and top end. Also dropped 2-3mpg.
Old 03-24-2011, 04:04 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The graph shows an increase in torque from the moment the drums start turning even with the 2" primarys and no cats.
Old 03-24-2011, 04:31 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert91RS
The graph shows an increase in torque from the moment the drums start turning even with the 2" primarys and no cats.
Thanks. I know how to read a graph.
Old 03-24-2011, 06:12 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
nikon2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

subscribing.. I was thinking about putting headers on my new 6.2l, but if people are losing mpg I may hold off!
Old 03-25-2011, 08:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TX Tahoe Z71
Thanks. I know how to read a graph.
LOL I was actually responding to CDNs last post. We're all friends here and I have much respect for your opinions. Not looking to offend.
Old 03-25-2011, 08:52 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert91RS
LOL I was actually responding to CDNs last post. We're all friends here and I have much respect for your opinions. Not looking to offend.
Haha, I was just being a smartass


Quick Reply: headers tune/MPG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.