GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Want to beat a 1999-2004 Mustang GT

Old May 25, 2014 | 09:20 AM
  #1  
Saber123316's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default Want to beat a 1999-2004 Mustang GT

What would it take to beat a 1999-2004 Mustang GT in the 1/4 in my 2004 ECSB z71 4x4 1500?

No nitrous, all motor. Reason I ask is I have a 2001 Mustang GT and I wouldnt mind my truck being as quick or faster.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 10:22 AM
  #2  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

Cam it, or 2,000 lb weight reduction.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

Boltons custom tune cam stall gears and boom you're there or even easier swap to a 6.0 add a cam. Honestly what does your mustang run? Low 14s? It doesn't take much to get into the low 14s.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 10:43 AM
  #4  
Saber123316's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gamble686
Boltons custom tune cam stall gears and boom you're there or even easier swap to a 6.0 add a cam. Honestly what does your mustang run? Low 14s? It doesn't take much to get into the low 14s.
Yeah i would say low 14's its stock I like it that way so far.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

Cam and stall should get you about even.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
Saber123316's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gamble686
Cam and stall should get you about even.
what would be a good stall and cam? 3000-3200?

Also would like a good cam for power + the ability to go turbo later. I think my Mustang is on the chopping block.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #7  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

TU0 from speed inc would be a good choice and a 3000 stall.
Reply
Old May 25, 2014 | 09:37 PM
  #8  
AUTOT3K's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

they really aren't to fast, especially that year range! do the basic upgrades and your set! nobody mentioned a tune with the cam, add a good tune to your budget
Reply
Old May 26, 2014 | 08:20 AM
  #9  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 642
Likes: 21
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by AUTOT3K
they really aren't to fast, especially that year range! do the basic upgrades and your set! nobody mentioned a tune with the cam, add a good tune to your budget
Maybe stock....My brother and I had a 2003 GT PI 4.6 with an automatic and 2.87s with about 80K on it. Bought it fairly cheap because it had a "cracked head". The cracked head was actually a broken intake manifold. The guy had slapped some kind of cone filter on the stock maf and it was literally bouncing around the engine compartment. It also had a horrible case of misfire. We changed the intake manifold (actually used a Dorman which we later read and saw evidence of a 10+ HP loss but a torque gain), spark plugs, and coil boots. Installed a 160*F thermostat. A BBK CAI with filter through fender opening, an elbow and throttle body IIRC 70mm, a BBK offroad X pipe, flowmaster catback, and a used hypertech programmer set for premium fuel. Put some meaty 275/40R17s in the back. No weight reduction, middle of summer it ran 8.70 @ 82 in the 1/8. Went back in fall and ran 8.40s @ 85-86 mph in the 1/8. Never had it at the 1/4 track, but that kind of 1/8 ET and MPH is good for a low 13 @ ~105 mph. My brothers buddy had a 2005 3-valve automatic GT and the 03 gave it a good run STOCK. Curb weight was about 3,250 and race weight with a solo driver about 3,450-3,500 depending on it it was me or the lighter brother driving. The car stock made about 260 hp/300tq and a ET/HP calculator put it about about 295/360 at the flywheel. Car dyno'd about 255/308 on a Dynojet. They are not as weak as you would think.
Reply
Old May 26, 2014 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
AUTOT3K's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Maybe stock....My brother and I had a 2003 GT PI 4.6 with an automatic and 2.87s with about 80K on it. Bought it fairly cheap because it had a "cracked head". The cracked head was actually a broken intake manifold. The guy had slapped some kind of cone filter on the stock maf and it was literally bouncing around the engine compartment. It also had a horrible case of misfire. We changed the intake manifold (actually used a Dorman which we later read and saw evidence of a 10+ HP loss but a torque gain), spark plugs, and coil boots. Installed a 160*F thermostat. A BBK CAI with filter through fender opening, an elbow and throttle body IIRC 70mm, a BBK offroad X pipe, flowmaster catback, and a used hypertech programmer set for premium fuel. Put some meaty 275/40R17s in the back. No weight reduction, middle of summer it ran 8.70 @ 82 in the 1/8. Went back in fall and ran 8.40s @ 85-86 mph in the 1/8. Never had it at the 1/4 track, but that kind of 1/8 ET and MPH is good for a low 13 @ ~105 mph. My brothers buddy had a 2005 3-valve automatic GT and the 03 gave it a good run STOCK. Curb weight was about 3,250 and race weight with a solo driver about 3,450-3,500 depending on it it was me or the lighter brother driving. The car stock made about 260 hp/300tq and a ET/HP calculator put it about about 295/360 at the flywheel. Car dyno'd about 255/308 on a Dynojet. They are not as weak as you would think.




I took it as he was talking about a bone stock one, so my comment refers to a bone stock one. everyone has heard about a fast mustang...just don't see them often
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.