GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Something dont seem right.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #1  
jleews6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: roanoke virginia
Default Something dont seem right.

I have been thinking about buying a new truck and have really been thinking about getting a 2500 ECSB 4x4. My plan was to get a 6.0L with the 4l80E however after a couple of weeks ago I might just stick with the 1500 5.3 combo.
I say this because I borrowed my father inlaws 6.0 2500 RCSB 4x4 to go pick up a Mustang out in Indiana that I bought for my son. The reason we used his truck was for the ext. cab and i figured it would be a good test to see how I was going to like this combo. Right from the start before I even hooked up the trailor it seemed like it was working alot harder than my truck just to drive around town. Then when we hooked up the trailer I was really let down because it really was working. When I loaded up the Mustang and started out back home I was shocked because the first thing I thought to myself was "my truck (1500 RCLB 5.3 4l60e/373 gear) would outpull this thing like nothing. to top it all off the gas MPG was only about 12 MPG and my truck gets about 14 towing at 75 MPH. Has anybody else noticed this or was there something wrong? His truck is an 06 with low mileage and it runs great other than being underpowerd.
Could it be the extra weight from the EC and 4wd?
Or is my truck a freak. keep in mind that my truck ran 14.6 and its 100% stock and everybody that has driven my truck is shocked at how good it runs.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #2  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Extended cab and 4wd add a ton of weight, as does the heavier duty stuff associated with the 3/4 ton. The 80E saps a lot of power too.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #3  
Allgonoshow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Default

there would be a BIG difference in a 1500 with a 6.0l
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #4  
Chevy Cowboy's Avatar
Piss Pumps for Sale
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, The True North Strong and Free!
Default

this is why most people with a 2500 opt for the duramax, a 2500 is alot lot heavier then a 1500, and takes nothing to spin a 60E compared to the 80E
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #5  
jleews6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: roanoke virginia
Default

Ok these are the things that I was thinking also. It would be nice if you could get the 6.0L with the 4l80e in a 1500 2wd. I think that would be the best combo for what I want.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #6  
brent1976's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
Default

My dad drives like a grandpa, and I've noticed that after I drive it for a while it seems to run alot better. I think it's the cumputer being used to him driving it, and then changing more towards how I drive. Gas milage doesn't change though, 10-13 mpg, no matter what.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #7  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by jleews6
Ok these are the things that I was thinking also. It would be nice if you could get the 6.0L with the 4l80e in a 1500 2wd. I think that would be the best combo for what I want.
What you want is only a swap away
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SS94S10
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Jan 3, 2019 01:57 PM
Gadgetized
FORCED INDUCTION
39
Oct 22, 2015 09:06 AM
livefast1
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
4
Sep 25, 2015 07:31 PM
silver-mod-o
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
3
Sep 7, 2015 10:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.