GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Questions about an 02 2wd.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #1  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default Questions about an 02 2wd.

My cousin just got an ext.cab shortbed 2wd with the 5.3 and it has 3.42gears.This truck hauls *** and it is bone stock.My question is what will these 2wd ext.cab shortbed trucks with the 5.3 run in the 1/4mile bone stock?I know alot of you guys have ran yalls when it was stock and have truck just like this.I am very curious.We are goin to run it and see what it will do in a few weeks.
Later guys
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #2  
onyx's Avatar
14 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

well if you run it in Tucson, AZ.. expect a disappointing 16.4.... thank you altitude!...

everyones truck runs like **** here... its embarassing.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #3  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default

16.4?That sucks,I would think it would at least run a 15.5 or so.It sure as hell feels like it.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
onyx's Avatar
14 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

when i had my 96 impala ss w/ magnaflow catback and RAM air, it only ran 15.5 here... and i ran faster than the other impala's in Tucson!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 04:47 PM
  #5  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Mid to low 15's are not out of the question with some weight reduction and a good track.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default

Yeah I figured it could run mid to low 15's woth out much trouble.
Thanks guys for the help.Any one elses input would be great also.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
yellowls1truck's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

15.4 @ 87 mph, bone stock. had a little less than 200 miles on the odometer.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #8  
KeukaZ71's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

wait a minute guys, i know i am not an expert on track times, but this is an EXTENDED CAB w/ 3.42 gears, STOCK. i was figuring low 16's. mine with all it's mods, was running a 15.5. how can this be running the same time. i know i have 4WD but that doesn't make up for that much weight, plus it help me get out of the hole with that YANK3000
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 10:46 PM
  #9  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default

Originally Posted by KeukaZ71
wait a minute guys, i know i am not an expert on track times, but this is an EXTENDED CAB w/ 3.42 gears, STOCK. i was figuring low 16's. mine with all it's mods, was running a 15.5. how can this be running the same time. i know i have 4WD but that doesn't make up for that much weight, plus it help me get out of the hole with that YANK3000

Yeah but you have a 99 model,they dont quiet run like the 01's and 02's.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #10  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 2
From: Sealy/Katy TX
Default

My dad has an 02 ext.cab shortbed Z71 with the 5.3 and 3.73gears.His mods are a HPP III,K&N FIPK,thorttlebody spacer,and borla exhaust.My cousins 02 ext.cab shortbed 2wd with the 5.3 and 3.42s stock feels a little bit faster than my dads does.I dont know,but maybe the Z71 weighs alot more than I think.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.