GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Bully Dog E85/gas programer.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
chevz7102's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Smile Bully Dog E85/gas programer.

Enyone use or herd of the new bullydog programer for E85 engines? I would like to get one for better mileage when running E85 and some more HP to. Bully dog says you can switch to gas when running the tuner also.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #2  
m3srt's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Default

e85 sucks ***** with the 50-60 cents you save at the pump you will be going back twice as much as using premium trust me i tried it , belive it or not its cheaper to use premium than e85 its garbage ...

the only good thing about it is that it's 104 octane and it gives you a "slight" boost in hp



Go With Charlie Wheatley FTW !!!!!

Last edited by m3srt; Mar 14, 2009 at 01:18 PM. Reason: re do
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #3  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Exclamation

Originally Posted by m3srt
e85 sucks ***** with the 50-60 cents you save at the pump you will be going back twice as much as using premium trust me i tried it , belive it or not its cheaper to use premium than e85 its garbage ...

the only good thing about it is that it's 104 octane and it gives you a "slight" boost in hp



Go With Charlie Wheatley FTW !!!!!

Not to **** on your parade m3srt, but I must instill some additional thought into this thread that is contrary to your statement. E85 is not Garbage, it is Alcohol. Mixed with a 15% blend of Gas and Additives. This fuel is a nice alternative to high octane gasoline when run on engines designed to take advantage of it. An engine designed to run ideally on E85 will more than likely make more torque with less throttle input, thereby giving greater miles per gallon so to speak than an engine that was designed to run at a compromise on 87 octane gasoline (running E85 with just a factory tune to compensate). An engine designed to run E85 will by nature be able to have higher static compression ratio, somewhat increased ignition timing advance (will vary some given the slight difference in burn rate from gasoline), as well as have the potential to run higher boost pressures with reduced chance of detonation. In order to compensate for the decreased energy content of Ethanol in the fuel blend you will need to use higher rates of fuel flow i.e. modify the fuel tables in the ECU, and possibly upsize the fuel injectors.

And going to the fuel pump twice as often? That's rediculous, maybe if you drive with a lead foot 70% more often than when you were running premium, but if you don't change your driving habits you're only looking at a 10-20% increase in fuel consumption. Right now with premium at $2.20 in my neighborhood, E85 would run (based on your $.60 difference figure) ~ $1.60 that's 27% less cost. If you can realize no more than a 27% decrease in fuel economy I see it as a win, just in octane rating of 105 vs. 91 with California grade premium gasoline.

Again, in order to realize the benefits of this fuel you have to have an engine that is optimized for it. At current GM/Ford/others has introduced a stop-gap measure called flex fuel that allows consumers to run 87 octane gasoline as well as E85 ethanol/gasoline blend fuels. These are not, I repeat NOT optimum engine combos to take advantage of E85. This is just a way to get high ethanol blended fuels a demand base in the market, which unfortunately has a few cons in implementation for the early adopters. Give it a few years for Ethanol or other alternatives to Gasoline to come to market and you will see the manufacturers come out with more optimized solutions.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #4  
m3srt's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Default

well when i used it quite a few times it went right through my engine ... just imo



has anyone else used it on here id like to see MPG comparisons ....
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
Jeteys5.3's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

i just got 20.3 mpg with my 93 octane tune doing 75mph down the interstate for 200 miles and i know i stomped it once trying to **** off a hemi

I normally get 21-21.5mpg on the highway with cruise set
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 10:45 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: East of the east bay CA
Default

you might as well save your money and get a good tune. I know others will agree on this.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:05 PM
  #7  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Default

Originally Posted by sharky05
you might as well save your money and get a good tune. I know others will agree on this.
I Agree with this statement as well. I apologize for not replying to your original question O.P., take a look at EFI Live and HPTuners for good tuning suites.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #8  
m3srt's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
I Agree with this statement as well. I apologize for not replying to your original question O.P., take a look at EFI Live and HPTuners for good tuning suites.

Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #9  
joeyc125's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Cedar, MN
Default

i ran e85 for awhile. Honestly the thing i liked most about it was the sweet smell while cold or in traffic compared to the gassy fumes i normally get due to not having cats. I noticed my fuel mileage was down and i did the math and it cost a **** hair more to run it compared to gas, only like two cents a gallon though. But as stated my engine is not built primarily for ethanol, and i could not fathom that due to limited availability, especially if you go on road trips you better have an 80 gallon tank in the bed. I do think if it were more readily available i may have built a 12:1 compression motor and been pretty happy with it.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #10  
chevz7102's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Thanks for the tips people. I agree with the mileage figures I get 1-2 mpg less also if I get this tune from bullydog maybe ili be happy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolftrk99
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
Oct 2, 2015 08:17 AM
Go5.3tt06
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
120
Sep 12, 2015 09:29 AM
BIGD4504
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Jul 28, 2015 11:46 AM
Aboss
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Jul 9, 2015 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.