GM Parts Classifieds For Sale and Wanted

F/S: 212/218 low lift comp cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
03Screamer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Arrow F/S: 212/218 low lift comp cam

I bought this cam (212/218 522/529 114 LSA) off of Scream a couple of months ago but never got around to installing it. If I remember correctly the cam has around 10k miles on it. This is a great cam for a 4.8 or 5.3, that will not sacrafice driveability much at all. I'm asking $195 obo plus shipping. Thanks
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 07:18 AM
  #2  
Scream's Avatar
MOOBIES Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,924
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

I was wondering what ever happened to you! Good luck...here's a bump for ya.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
carbon04's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

im not too good with cam specs, is this cam milder than a z06 cam or better?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Waco, TX
Default

I want it!!! pm sent
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #5  
greentahoe's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default

DAMN!!! I want it if the other guy falls through.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
leochevy2001's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 0
From: Spring, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by carbon04
im not too good with cam specs, is this cam milder than a z06 cam or better?
I think it is better. With the right tune some have gained about 30rwhp with this same cam. I also think that you would need a convertor with this cam.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #7  
Scream's Avatar
MOOBIES Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,924
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

I gained 31hp with this cam and NO tune
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #8  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by leochevy2001
I think it is better. With the right tune some have gained about 30rwhp with this same cam. I also think that you would need a convertor with this cam.
You dont need a converter with the 212/218. I dont have one, but I will be getting one. The need for the converter is greater with the LS6 cam. Low end with it sucks.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #9  
03Screamer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

I have three people interested at the moment, I'll let you guys know what happens. As far as comparing this cam to a ls6 cam, I'd agree with the others and say this cam is better suited to a 4.8 or 5.3. The ls6 cam peaks at about 7,000 in a 346 mainly do to the high lsa, so you can imagine how it would be in a 4.8 or 5.3.

Also, if you guys are interested I just purchased a 3200TT Yank converter from Tbyrne. I decided to put a 4L80E in my truck, and unfortunately this converter is not compatible with the 80E. This would be a great converter for the cam I'm selling or any other moderate sized cam. The Yank is BRAND NEW and sells for $890 plus shipping. I'm letting it go for $760 obo, a $130 savings. I also have a NIP 60E Trans-go shift kit, $80 bucks or I'll throw it in with the converter for another $50. Thanks for your interest

-Brock
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
gcooper's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland, WA
Default

sent a pm
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.