I found these numbers posted on another forum...

First Run: 154.86 total hp at all four wheels/234.74 total tq at all four wheels.

Second Run: 161.57 total hp at all four wheels/239.29 total tq at all four wheels.

Last Run: 171.52 total hp at all four wheels/251.46 total tq at all four wheels.

Does anyone know why an H2 would dyno so low? Is the H2 drivetrain just that inefficient?

They also installed a Magnacharger Radix System and posted the following results...

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-...lapdHummer.JPG

Can the Radix make this much difference or are the first numbers hosed?

Thanks for your comments!

Cory

 

i can't say for sure because i don't have the knowledge to do so, but those first numbers seem way to low. i would figure 200 or better at least. if that is correct, i guess we'll never see a 13 sec H2.

 

All wheel drive dyno I guess?

 

Actually, people have built H2's running faster then 13's I believe BPP (Breathless Performance Products) still has they're 409/pro-charged H2 running low low 12's, they were trying to get it into the 11's, but having tranny issues. That's what I wanted to do with mine when I still had it, now that is a sleeper

 

Does anyone think that 375 rwhp is a reasonable expectation for the Radix only install? I ask because I cannot knowingly buy a vehicle that will just be a dog no matter what I do. If I get the H2 I intend to go with a Radix, Thunder 220 cam and springs, shorty headers, and a magnaflow exhaust. Would 400 Rwhp be reasonable with that combo.

Thanks for any guidance.

Cory

 

Check these out:

http://www.lingenfelter.com/performanceh2_hummer.asp
http://www.lingenfelter.com/performance427suvturbo.asp

Anything can be made to go fast. It just depends on how far you're willing and able to go.

 

9 second barn?

 

i'd love to see one of those wax some azz

 

bolt enough JATO pods onto it and I guaran-damn-tee a barn will do 9's