GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

intake duration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default

I'm not refering to a reverse split cam those are for special applications.A conventional pattern cam often has more exhaust duration than intake duration.You can only add as much intake charge naturally asperated as you can as you can remove without losing horsepower.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #22  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

idk, i'd probably use a reverse split on my n-a motor right now an even larger one with some pacesetters & 3'' duals.

i was more trying to point out, how geoff compared same intake lobes w/ different exhaust lobes. the only difference being a later opening exhaust valve. it changed the power curve, but not the range...
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #23  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
idk, i'd probably use a reverse split on my n-a motor right now an even larger one with some pacesetters & 3'' duals.

i was more trying to point out, how geoff compared same intake lobes w/ different exhaust lobes. the only difference being a later opening exhaust valve. it changed the power curve, but not the range...
so thats in agreement with whitt?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default

Reverse splits are really nice on a track only f-body,but I wouldn't even consider one in daily driven truck.I suggest going with a more conservative cam with intake duration in the range of 208 to 216 and exhaust duration in the 212 to 220 range and a 112 to 115 lobe separation.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #25  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

found this:

Duration is a major contributor to the torque curve and where it occurs in the engine's rpm band. Generally speaking, as you increase the amount of intake lobe duration, this makes for an earlier-opening and later-closing intake valve. This additional duration also extends the rpm point where peak torque occurs. This tends to increase peak hp (depending upon the other components used on the engine) while sacrificing low- and mid-range torque. Conversely, a very short duration camshaft opens the intake valve later and closes it sooner, reducing the potential for high-rpm horsepower but increasing torque at a lower engine speed.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #26  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
found this:

Duration is a major contributor to the torque curve and where it occurs in the engine's rpm band. Generally speaking, as you increase the amount of intake lobe duration, this makes for an earlier-opening and later-closing intake valve. This additional duration also extends the rpm point where peak torque occurs. This tends to increase peak hp (depending upon the other components used on the engine) while sacrificing low- and mid-range torque. Conversely, a very short duration camshaft opens the intake valve later and closes it sooner, reducing the potential for high-rpm horsepower but increasing torque at a lower engine speed.
anyone in agreement here?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #27  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Yeah, that was my belief.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 05:06 PM
  #28  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by marc_w
Yeah, that was my belief.
I'm just trying to figure out the answer.
I was asking whitt about the exhaust lobe controlling powrband more in an LS series engine because that is its weak side as I understand it.

BigTex said he had some comments, has not responded yet.

seems the Cam world says intake is the determinate factor, but I'm not ruling out whitt's comment as every engine has its own characteristics.

I hope people aren't holding back for fear of being wrong we are all here to learn, right?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #29  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

I hope people aren't holding back for fear of being wrong
yeah, you have to be careful about that. no one wants their internet feelings hurt
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #30  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
yeah, you have to be careful about that. no one wants their internet feelings hurt
not sure if this is the case, I would just like to figure this out
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.