Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2014, 11:53 AM
  #1  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results

I found this article on holley's website. it basically compares the Hi-Rise to the Mid-rise on the same motor...

Holley Intakes - Taking LS Intakes To New Heights - Super Chevy Magazine

results

Not surprisingly, the Hi-Ram intake offered more power and torque, with peak numbers of 563 hp and 505 lb-ft of torque. Extra top-end power is always welcome, but what about having to fit it underhood? That is where the mid-rise comes in. In terms of power, the mid-rise was no slouch, offering 543 hp and 499 lb-ft of torque. A review of the graph illustrates that the mid-rise actually offered more power than the Hi-Ram up to 4,800 rpm, and kept pace with its big brother up to 5,900 rpm. Only after 6,000 rpm did the high-Ram pull away, but there is no denying the extra 20 hp offered by the tunnel ram design. Loyal readers will remember we tested the mid-rise previously in carbureted trim back in Modern Mouse, part 5. Regardless of what system you pick, you'll be proud to pop the hood and strut your stuff.

Read more: Holley Intakes - Taking LS Intakes To New Heights - Super Chevy Magazine
Old 01-06-2014, 12:08 PM
  #2  
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
RS/SS 4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 1,258
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So about a 20hp difference. In that case ill take the highrise cuz the mid rise still looks funny.
Old 01-06-2014, 12:15 PM
  #3  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS/SS 4.8
So about a 20hp difference. In that case ill take the highrise cuz the mid rise still looks funny.
Beyond 6k. Below 4800 the mid makes more hp and tq. This was with a 383, so if you have a smaller engine the mid rise should prove to be even more beneficial. On 400 + CI engines I think the high rise would be the bet. Thats just my .02
Old 01-06-2014, 12:33 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Beyond 6k. Below 4800 the mid makes more hp and tq. This was with a 383, so if you have a smaller engine the mid rise should prove to be even more beneficial. On 400 + CI engines I think the high rise would be the bet. Thats just my .02

I agree with this. Below 4500 there is a clear winner, and above 6k there is a clear winner. Toss that in a 364 and those RPM ranges are gonna move slightly to the right. If you spin high RPM in something larher than a 6 liter than its a no brainer... for everyone else its not so cut and dry.

I will say in quickly looking at the pics I am a little surprised. Whats different about the mid rise? To me it just looks like shorter runners. so I would have expected an opposite end result.
Old 01-06-2014, 02:27 PM
  #5  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 374 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

I would have expected an opposite results as well...

Wouldve been really useful if they dynod a stock intake in there as well.
Old 01-06-2014, 02:43 PM
  #6  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

i figured yall would find that result interesting...
Old 01-06-2014, 05:18 PM
  #7  
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
TIM Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: OH IO :(
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yeah good read , I want the bottom end to get a heavy truck moving .
Give me a light car and I'll take the highrise .
Old 01-06-2014, 05:46 PM
  #8  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Yeah so this is gonna be my next mod. Mainly for the cool looking factor. I just wonder what the results would be with boost. My truck makes good boost in low rpms so i am kinda thinking about the mid rise.
Old 01-06-2014, 05:48 PM
  #9  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 374 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

Boost doesnt care about your intake.
Old 01-06-2014, 05:49 PM
  #10  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
Boost doesnt care about your intake.
So since i am a huge vag that has not gone over 5800rpms since i put the kit on. You think the mid rise would fit my vag-e-ness better?


Quick Reply: Holley Hi-Rise vs Mid-Rise dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.