GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dynoed My '03 5.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #1  
Syphon59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Dynoed My '03 5.3L

My only mod's are a K&N intake and Gibson Catback.....All runs were in 2nd gear

Pull #1: 244.9rwhp & 260.2rwtq
Pull #2: 244.9rwhp & 261.5rwtq

Pull's 1&2 were right off the street and no cool down between runs

Pull #3: 250.7rwhp & 270.5rwtq
Pull #4: 254.8rwhp &274.7rwtq

Pull's 3&4 had 5 minute cool down periods

All in All I think that's pretty good for a truck with 2 mods and automatic....Considering my 2000 Mustang did 255rwhp and 300rwtq with o/r x-pipe, catback, intake, 70mm t-body, intake spacer, and u/d pulleys.

Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

Yeah, these trucks are pretty impressive. Also consider what gear you dynoed your mustang and truck in. Oxidizer posted about how he consistently saw a 12hp and 15lb-ft increase in torque dynoing in third gear compared to second gear.

Good numbers!

John
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:58 PM
  #3  
Syphon59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

yeah the dyno shop owner started out in 3rd gear on the some previous run but keep on revving out at 4,000rpm. I think my best in 3rd was 225rwhp and 285rwtq or something. I told him to try it in 2nd and we had no problems in 2nd
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:59 PM
  #4  
GoldenVelvet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 0
From: Fresno/Chico
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

Why the power differance in third??
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
Syphon59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

oh yeah forgot to mention....my GT had a 3.73's in the rear.
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #6  
Syphon59's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

what's the average stock 5.3L dyno at?
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 04:43 AM
  #7  
Tokez420's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 1
From: SoCali Orange County
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

mine dynod in at 246HP and 257TQ in 2nd gear with UPD and flowmaster. i have a 4.8L 3.73 gears
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
oxidizr's Avatar
Moderator / Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: Dynoed My '03 5.3L

GoldenVelvet:

Anytime you are utilizing gearing for "mechanical advantage" the higher the gear ratio (lower gear i.e. 1st gear 1:3.06) the more power it takes to turn it. As you near a 1:1 ratio (i.e third gear) the more accurate you power numbers are. It is the reason a vehicle will dyno higher with 2.73 vs. 4.10 rear gears with the exact same motor...

Syohon 59:

99' 2wd seems to see 225-235 RWHP 255-270 RWTQ
00'-01' seems to see 235-245 RWHP 270-290 RWTQ
02'-03' seems to see 245-255 RWHP 270-290 RWTQ

Most fall into these categories ... for SAE corrected numbers, but of course there are always exceptions.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$A_Money$81
FORCED INDUCTION
24
Mar 27, 2023 10:25 AM
SS94S10
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Jan 3, 2019 01:57 PM
zblee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Nov 11, 2015 12:41 AM
jscherbs
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 30, 2015 07:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.