GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dyno Results with LS6 intake yet??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #1  
KB's Avatar
KB
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: HTX
Default Dyno Results with LS6 intake yet??

I know this topic has been beat to death, but has anyone dynoed the results of an LS6 intake yet? I'm debating on whether or not to do the swap but I want to be sure the cost of it all is justified with gains that aren't just "marginal".

I've read a bazillion threads on it, some even promising dyno-results, but nothings ever been updated.

Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #2  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,365
Likes: 292
From: Humble Texas
Default

tons of guys on tech.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

i've seen good dyno # increase, but have not seen enough e/t drop for the $, personally I dont care what people say, all in paper it makes sense but not at the track, I think people underestimate the truck intake, thats why im sticking with my truck intake... on my dyno my truck pulled to 6200rpm and stayed flat all the way to 7200 where rev limit hit... how much more do people really want to spin to? on a stock bottom end?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
Slow91z's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Corydon, IN
Default

Slightly off topic but i there a difference between the 5.3 truck intake and the 6.0??
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #5  
IMD's Avatar
IMD
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Slow91z
Slightly off topic but i there a difference between the 5.3 truck intake and the 6.0??
there is no difference.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
Slow91z's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Corydon, IN
Default

Cool thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #7  
OrlandoFL4.8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by ap2002
i've seen good dyno # increase, but have not seen enough e/t drop for the $, personally I dont care what people say, all in paper it makes sense but not at the track, I think people underestimate the truck intake, thats why im sticking with my truck intake... on my dyno my truck pulled to 6200rpm and stayed flat all the way to 7200 where rev limit hit... how much more do people really want to spin to? on a stock bottom end?
Dont think that could have been said much better. Trucks are heavy and I believe the truck intake performs better down low where the trucks need it.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #8  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 1
From: Cabot, AR
Default

The truck intake can't handle big cubes, I have seen big motors with big cams like 230-240ish flatline at 5800 rpms. It might be good for a smaller motor and a mild cam, but the car manifold will make more power on more powerful setups.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #9  
Tootall's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 1
From: League City, Tx
Default

save your money for some 28" slicks!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #10  
tarinitup's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 1
From: Odessa Texas
Default

I'm going to see how deep into the 11's the truck intake will take me. I wanted a vic jr. but I think the $1500 in swap costs could be used in something better than losing a few tenths.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.