GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Anyone disassemble their RADIX yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #41  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
That IC runs the whole length of the manifold making the blower discharge opening look small
That's what I was trying to say about the Lightning intercooler...

Pics can be seen in the articles on this page: http://www.timskelton.com/lightning/articles/index.htm
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #42  
David Cairns's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

The Lightning motor does not have all that pushrod stuff and cam in the way, so the intercooler can be quite deep.

Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #43  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Yeah, I was just trying to say that 'making the' / 'installing a' intercooler the full length of the base of the blower would 'probably' be beneficial since the L's come like that. (not knowing the F-body Radix's do too).
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #44  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

It is not the length, it is the "depth" of the intercooler in this case. Putting a longer I/C core that is not as thick will not result in any gains.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #45  
Keith's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Mefis
Default

How close are the blowers to the bottom of the hood? Would there be any room for a deeper IC, with some kind of blower spacer?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 12:48 AM
  #46  
Ryan23silverado's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

just buy a whipple J/K
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:17 AM
  #47  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
It is not the length, it is the "depth" of the intercooler in this case. Putting a longer I/C core that is not as thick will not result in any gains.
Even if it has more surface area??
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:33 AM
  #48  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by marc_w
Even if it has more surface area??

Yes..
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #49  
BigTex's Avatar
Thread Starter
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

Fandango's idea crossed my mind too. Put a spacer between the Radix and the lower manifold. Then mount a deeper cooler that extends up into the spacer.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #50  
Ryan23silverado's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Surface area does set the measure for cooling calculations (other than design bar and plate vs. fins etc.) But if you look at the roots blower, it outlets in a small section just below the blower. The LS1 kit has 1/3 of the intercooler acting as a 'heat sink' instead of a medium of convection cooling.

Lengthening the intercooler would have some benefit if the intake manifold plenum volume was increased by way of larger height. Although, at higher pressures, air finds the quickest way out - directly below the outlet in this case. What you really need to do is gather all of the heated air into a pipe, send that pipe to the intercooler, into another pipe to take all the cooled air back to the engine. ...tough to do in this case.

Guys have run what, 12psi on these blowers? You should be okay. And that is a lot of power gain. You are just too much of a gear head BigTex
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.