GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.0 Head Q???'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 02:41 AM
  #11  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

honestly waht you would gain in HP from compression you would probably lose in flow rate
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 06:30 AM
  #12  
912jonathon's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Lumber City, GA
Default

i will have to sleeve the 5.7 block and put a new piston in it before i sell it.

Quik, would you just leave the 317 in it for now?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #13  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

for now yes, they flow good its just with a lower CR your cam choices are somewhat limted. larger cams like high cr but running something small or ot some large would be ideal and still make great power

a stock 241 head should be like 4.8s just given away
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #14  
Yelo's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 1
From: Geneseo, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Quik

a stock 241 head should be like 4.8s just given away
I'm gonna argue that one....they're within 5% of the flow of a stock 243 or 317 head, and they're REALLY CHEAP, I'd bet that with the restriction caused by our intake manifolds the flow between the 241 and the 317 is almost identical when installed (flow-bench numbers don't count here...try flowing the heads with the intake on and see what happens), because the valve sizes are the same and it's only the port volume that's smaller the 241 heads are going to create more low-end torque than the 243 or 317 heads....and at the rpm where the the 317's come into their best our intake manifolds can't flow enough to keep up with the heads
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #15  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by Yelo
I'm gonna argue that one....they're within 5% of the flow of a stock 243 or 317 head, and they're REALLY CHEAP, I'd bet that with the restriction caused by our intake manifolds the flow between the 241 and the 317 is almost identical when installed (flow-bench numbers don't count here...try flowing the heads with the intake on and see what happens), because the valve sizes are the same and it's only the port volume that's smaller the 241 heads are going to create more low-end torque than the 243 or 317 heads....and at the rpm where the the 317's come into their best our intake manifolds can't flow enough to keep up with the heads
didnt say htey were junk just said they should be given away
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 01:51 PM
  #16  
912jonathon's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Lumber City, GA
Default

i will be running a 224/224dur 581/581lift on 112 cam. if i understand it right, this is a small cam for 6.0's??
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #17  
Yelo's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 1
From: Geneseo, NY
Default

Originally Posted by 912jonathon
i will be running a 224/224dur 581/581lift on 112 cam. if i understand it right, this is a small cam for 6.0's??
Think of it more as an "appropriate" cam for a 6.0 that a "small" cam, it'll make great power and will still daily drive very well...it'll combine very well with the 241 heads but the truck intake will become a restriction up above 5700rpms or so

I do have to ask why you feel a 6.0 is needed when you already have a 5.7 ??, the 5.7 has been proven to make BIG power very easily. The 6.0 has more room for expansion but you can still get 383cid out of a 3.9" bore and 4" stroke crank....I'm just thinking you might be better off putting the money for a 6.0 into a stroked rotating assembly for the motor you have now and end up with bigger cubes than you would with the stock 6.0
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #18  
912jonathon's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Lumber City, GA
Default

the only reason im going to a 6.0 is cause my hidden nitrous system come unvailed friday night when my nut holding my nozzle came loose and went down and busted my piston
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
greedygenius
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
11
Sep 3, 2015 06:51 AM
GrooveCityZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Aug 31, 2015 12:05 PM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
Aug 8, 2015 07:59 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.