5.3 vs 5.7
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Hey, i was just wondering a couple things about the 5.3 and 5.7 engines. how come it seems, f-body guys stick a cam in and w/ free flowing exhaust and intake, there pushin 350+rwhp, but w/ the same mods on a 5.3L we'd probably be hittin near the 300rwhp mark? just lookin for an explanation.
thanks,
thanks,
#2
Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Hey, i was just wondering a couple things about the 5.3 and 5.7 engines. how come it seems, f-body guys stick a cam in and w/ free flowing exhaust and intake, there pushin 350+rwhp, but w/ the same mods on a 5.3L we'd probably be hittin near the 300rwhp mark? just lookin for an explanation.
thanks,
thanks,
Heads and tuning mostly. I wouldn't compare rwhp numbers between the two personally. Get a baseline dyno for your truck and go from there. I think you would find that your hp/tq increases would be about on par with the increases a Fbody given the same mods. If you were to drop in a LS1 you would not dyno as high as a car because you have alot more powertrain loss in the truck.
#3
Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Hey, i was just wondering a couple things about the 5.3 and 5.7 engines. how come it seems, f-body guys stick a cam in and w/ free flowing exhaust and intake, there pushin 350+rwhp, but w/ the same mods on a 5.3L we'd probably be hittin near the 300rwhp mark? just lookin for an explanation.
thanks,
thanks,
Heads and tuning mostly. I wouldn't compare rwhp numbers between the two personally. Get a baseline dyno for your truck and go from there. I think you would find that your hp/tq increases would be about on par with the increases in a Fbody given the same mods. If you were to drop in a LS1 you would not dyno as high as a car because you have alot more powertrain loss in the truck.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 1
From: Auburn, AL
I think the driveline loss between the F-bodies isn't that much different. I imageine it is about the same % loss as a Vette. The rearend takes more power, and the longer driveshaft. I think it is a combo of the smaller displacement, heads, compression, and smaller cams.
#9
Originally Posted by black5.3
So what exactly is the difference between the 310 HP LS1 in the camaro and the 350 HP LS1 in the corvette?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TAPyvehc93
FORCED INDUCTION
13
Dec 27, 2015 12:14 PM



