4.8 v.s 5.3 or 6.0

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 3, 2009 | 11:46 PM

#21

stock48

9 Second Truck Club

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 3,655

Likes: 5

From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca

Quote:

Originally Posted by team39763

I had a 226 cam, yank 3000, built trans, and 4.10's. I even did weight reduction.

What were the times, and what tires did you run?

Apr 4, 2009 | 12:23 AM

#22

team39763

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 726

Likes: 0

I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.

Apr 4, 2009 | 12:32 AM

#23

budhayes3

PT's Slowest Truck

iTrader: (19)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 17,863

Likes: 2

From: Hackensack, NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by team39763

I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.

That's godawful, were you runnin in 3 feet of water?

Apr 4, 2009 | 02:02 AM

#24

GMCtrk

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (27)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 12,275

Likes: 19

From: Dallas

14. 0 with a stock intenral 6.0, im trdiunk tgh now thnak you

Apr 4, 2009 | 02:08 AM

#25

Wheatley

Truck Sponsor

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 3,286

Likes: 2

From: Sealy/Katy TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMCtrk

14. 0 with a stock intenral 6.0, im trdiunk tgh now thnak you

Apr 4, 2009 | 07:27 AM

#26

sonoma43

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,279

Likes: 0

From: Saint Joseph, MI

Quote:

Originally Posted by team39763

I ran 16.2 both times and I had on 285/50/20 street tires. Not a lot of spinning either.

was it tuned??? or was this motor in a military tank with no weight reduction?

Apr 4, 2009 | 10:30 AM

#27

team39763

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 726

Likes: 0

Nelson Performance installed the motor and tuned it. It was in my 2000 extended cab sportside. Allen said I had fuel problems(from having stock injectors I guess?).

Apr 4, 2009 | 10:33 AM

#28

sonoma43

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,279

Likes: 0

From: Saint Joseph, MI

at 16.2 you couldnt of been making enough power to run out of injector...well I guess the 2000's did only have 19lb/hr...but hell stock they run 16.2's

Apr 4, 2009 | 10:54 AM

#29

budhayes3

PT's Slowest Truck

iTrader: (19)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 17,863

Likes: 2

From: Hackensack, NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonoma43

at 16.2 you couldnt of been making enough power to run out of injector...well I guess the 2000's did only have 19lb/hr...but hell stock they run 16.2's

I think that only the 99's had the 19# injectors, and 00 and up are 24.7#

Apr 4, 2009 | 11:00 AM

#30

sonoma43

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,279

Likes: 0

From: Saint Joseph, MI

Quote:

Originally Posted by budhayes3

I think that only the 99's had the 19# injectors, and 00 and up are 24.7#

oh, I thought the 99 and 00 had the 19#er's....my bad

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 4
Next
Last