4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
Nov 29, 2002 | 04:26 PM
#31
11 Second Club
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Beaver Falls, PA
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />
Nov 29, 2002 | 05:05 PM
#32
TECH Resident
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by txiggy:
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, and my bolt on only 5.3 has run 13.8 for 2.5-3k less. <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, and my bolt on only 5.3 has run 13.8 for 2.5-3k less. <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
Nov 29, 2002 | 07:07 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by txiggy:
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">those times with those mods is horrible. u should be low-mid 13s
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">those times with those mods is horrible. u should be low-mid 13s
Nov 29, 2002 | 07:07 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by txiggy:
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">those times with those mods is horrible. u should be low-mid 13s
<strong>BS! My ATI charged 4.8 has only run high 13's to low 14's with a 4.10 gear, 3000 converter and LS-1 edit. Blow some sunshine somewhere else. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">those times with those mods is horrible. u should be low-mid 13s
Nov 29, 2002 | 07:40 PM
#35
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
damn hyperlite...you just won't give up on the 4.8 vs 5.3 argument <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 07:44 PM: Message edited by: juggalotus ]</small>
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 07:44 PM: Message edited by: juggalotus ]</small>
Nov 29, 2002 | 09:14 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by juggalotus:
<strong>damn hyperlite...you just won't give up on the 4.8 vs 5.3 argument <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">incorrect. i bring it up when someone else brings it up. everytime i hear someone dis the 4.8 i cant stand it. they consider it to be a frickin v6 or something, like its just a shitload slower. just bugs me cuz from what ive seen its not true, the 5.3 is faster, but its very close thats all im saying
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 09:21 PM: Message edited by: Thunder 2k1 ]</small>
<strong>damn hyperlite...you just won't give up on the 4.8 vs 5.3 argument <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">incorrect. i bring it up when someone else brings it up. everytime i hear someone dis the 4.8 i cant stand it. they consider it to be a frickin v6 or something, like its just a shitload slower. just bugs me cuz from what ive seen its not true, the 5.3 is faster, but its very close thats all im saying
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 09:21 PM: Message edited by: Thunder 2k1 ]</small>
Nov 29, 2002 | 10:06 PM
#37
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
do you hear someone crying? <img border="0" alt="[whiner]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cry.gif" />
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
Nov 29, 2002 | 11:06 PM
#38
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
whoa!!!! i hear it too! CRAZY! haha <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
hey thunder, if you think the 5.3L is almost as good as the 4.8L thats your opinion. but expect flames every time u bring something up about it because the dyno and track numbers prove you wrong. if you dont wanna hear people saying what is really true then just dont bring it up.
i believe it was something like a 13rwhp difference and a 30(or more?) rwtq difference between a bone stock 4.8 and 5.3 same year, gear, etc... with mods it gets worse. but yah, i guess they are close lol
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 11:06 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
hey thunder, if you think the 5.3L is almost as good as the 4.8L thats your opinion. but expect flames every time u bring something up about it because the dyno and track numbers prove you wrong. if you dont wanna hear people saying what is really true then just dont bring it up.
i believe it was something like a 13rwhp difference and a 30(or more?) rwtq difference between a bone stock 4.8 and 5.3 same year, gear, etc... with mods it gets worse. but yah, i guess they are close lol
<small>[ November 29, 2002, 11:06 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
Nov 29, 2002 | 11:20 PM
#40
TECH Resident
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Re: 4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
Yeah Thunder... I'd love to see some personal basis for some of your arguments. I know this thread it old and done, but there is a pretty big noticable difference between the 4.8 and 5.3's.
Really Slow Truck... just backin you up on this man, seeing all the posts you have made that were fully correct.
Really Slow Truck... just backin you up on this man, seeing all the posts you have made that were fully correct.