Well get to hunting there champ

 

why so hard to believe??
on the fastest truck list here graygmc ran a 13.32,on his mod list it doesnt show gears or a converter,so im assuming he's running a 3.42 gear and stock converter.reallyslowtruck ran a 13.98,he has a converter but his shows 3.42 gear and his is an extra cab.i would say its posibble.he list 4.10 gear,eaton posi and converter...that with the other mods seems that it would be possible.

 

I saying <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" /> to that time on what he listed he had done. Now if he has a built 6.0 that is a different story. I dont think a 4.8 with just bolt ons is going to run that. look at oxidizer's list and his times and oxipad has alot more done to his 5.3. spraying out of the hole wont even do that for ya i wouldnt think

<small>[ November 27, 2002, 08:57 AM: Message edited by: RED2K ]</small>

 

i'm not saying it can't be done, it most surely can. i'm just skeptical about ANYTHING that is on dragtruk.com. i would guess about 1/2 of the times on that site aren't real

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Thunder 2k1:
<strong>he doesnt have just "bolt-ons" hes got major things like 4.10s(probably the biggest factor in the low times) hes also got a stall and posi</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">hmm... so what would you consider gears if they aren't a bolt on? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> I would also have to say that the most obvious factor in getting those times is nitrous. That setup puts 5.3s in high 13 / low 14 range on good tires. 4.8s suck compared to 5.3s

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Thunder 2k1:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by really slow truck:
<strong> 4.8s suck compared to 5.3s</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">dont get that crap started. u know damn well thats not true</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">hahahaha riiiighhhhtttt <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> so according to this a 5.7L isnt swapping in a 5.3 truck because power differences wouldn't be too much. i mean, its only 4/10ths of a liter right <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> . theres a 1/2 liter difference between a 4.8 and 5.3. if you dont think half of a liter of displacement is important in performance then you can go right ahead thinking that <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

just out of curiosity which one do you own?

 

i was talking about the gains from added displacement in an ls1 compared to a 5.3L as an example.

i think i'll just leave it at that though

<small>[ November 28, 2002, 10:34 AM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>