4.8 running a 12.6 in the 1/4!!
#21
it should also be noted that i am the official unofficial 4.8L hater on this site.... just a bitter guy with a turd
...but they still suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
...but they still suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
#24
Thunder,
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.
#25
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fast4.8:
<strong>Thunder,
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">very well said <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />
oh yah, 4.8s suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
<strong>Thunder,
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">very well said <img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />
oh yah, 4.8s suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
#27
4.8's really suck, 5.3's suck, 6.0's dont suck, 7.0s hell yea thats what i need <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by parish8:
<strong>4.8's really suck, 5.3's suck, 6.0's dont suck, 7.0s hell yea thats what i need <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">...and 4.3s suck my left nut <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong>4.8's really suck, 5.3's suck, 6.0's dont suck, 7.0s hell yea thats what i need <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">...and 4.3s suck my left nut <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
#29
I thought some guy on DragTruk had a 8.1L in a 1/2 ton running a 11.14 (or 11.41) was going to do a 10L...thats the ticket. Anyone know where to get that "duralift cam" and some of them "port brothers heads" he's got? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
If this is true then maybe the LQ4 4.8L really does exist???
Richard
If this is true then maybe the LQ4 4.8L really does exist???
Richard
#30
TECH Addict
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fast4.8:
<strong>Thunder,
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">wise confusious has spoken <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
oh yeah, 4.8s suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong>Thunder,
The point being made on the 4.8's is not that they are a P.O.S. It's that they are a slower engine. My heavily bolted on 4.8 makes about the same RWTQ that a bone stock 5.3 makes. And If you didn't feel a difference between them, then you "butt-o-meter" is out of calibration. The 5.3 takes to the same mods that a 4.8 takes in a better way. The power curve is magnified by the longer stroke of the 5.3. The whole point of this thread is getting out of hand anyway. This is not about a 4.8 vs a 5.3, it's about a 4.8 going 12.6. The truck can do that, but "NO-ONE" has broken into the 12's on this site with a stock internal 4.8. This guy sys he did and then the info is incorrect, so what is it? No email addy to ask either. Yea a 4.8 has gone 13.2, but .6 seconds in a 1/4 mile is A LOT, A WHOLE LOT. And with the mods listed on that truck, he has got the best 4.8 made, or EVERYTHING was just perfect that day. I'm not at all jelous. I will be the first to congradulate the guy, I just want the correct info.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">wise confusious has spoken <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
oh yeah, 4.8s suck <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />


