GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

3” y pipe to 3.5 exhaust ?

Old Jul 3, 2023 | 05:19 PM
  #1  
Eulan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 19
Likes: 10
Default 3” y pipe to 3.5 exhaust ?

So my set up so far is Ls3 480, 1 3/4 long tubes, 3” y pipe. My question, is there any benefit increasing the single exhaust pipe diameter after the y merge?

Thank you in advance
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2023 | 06:11 PM
  #2  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

It wouldn't hurt but I think you'd also benefit from 1 7/8th headers on a engine that size.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2023 | 04:46 AM
  #3  
adriver's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 247
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

You mean like not creating a choke point? That merge is your problem. I currently have a nearly stock 4.8L and cut off the stock collector and went dual 2.5" all the way, and there was a HUGE difference, especially up top. Now it just keeps climbing smoothly all the way.

I remember doing the math on here and I calculated my exhaust (being the OD - wall thickness and then getting cross area). Dual 2.5" is within 1% of a single 3.5".
Here:
(If a 2.5" pipe is measured by OD. 16g steel is .0625" thick. (x2 = .125" thick, 2.5" - .125 = 2.375" ID. 2.375/2 = 1.1875 radius. Pi R sq = 4.43 sq inches of ID area.
3" pipe - .125 = 2.875". /2 = 1.4375 x Pi R sq = 6.49 sq in of ID area.
3.5" pipe - .125 = 3.375 /2 = 1.6875 x Pi R sq = 8.946 sq in.
dual 2.5" pipe is (4.43 x 2 =) 8.86 sq in.
A 3.5" pipe volume is 1% greater than dual 2.5".


For a 3" pipe with 16g walls, = 6.491 sq inches of cross area (for dual 3" pipes = 12.982 sq in" of total cross area).


A 4" pipe is 4" - .125 total wall thickness for ID = 3.875 /2 = 1.9375 Radius
(1.9375)squared x pi = 11.793 sq in" of total cross area.

You have bends in there that are reducing the flow, but a single 3.5" can only flow 68% of what a dual 3.0" can do.

if that was me, I'm doing a dual 3" to a 4" collector, or even a 4 1/2" collector, or more likely getting rid of that merge and just running dual 3" all the way. If it's an air pump, why would you create a blockage, or a choke point to block air?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2023 | 05:56 AM
  #4  
Eulan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 19
Likes: 10
Default

If I’ve already created the choke point with the 3” y pipe, I should just do a single 3” pipe into a good muffler and dump at rear bumper. Correct?

i know it’s not the perfect setup for top end but, will it at least help with low to mid range torque?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2023 | 08:09 AM
  #5  
smokinlmm's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 559
From: Coastal NC
Default

You will be fine with the 3” all the way out. Like mentioned earlier, you would need larger diameter headers to make any real beneficial gains from a larger exhaust downstream. I made over 500 rwhp with 1 7/8” headers to a y pipe to the factory exhaust with a magnaflow muffler.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2023 | 09:36 AM
  #6  
Eulan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 19
Likes: 10
Default

Thanks y’all, I’ll be running 3” for now
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2023 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
swathdiver's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 393
Likes: 64
From: Treasure Coast of Florida
Default

Gen IV 6.2 trucks use a 3.5" single exhaust,
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2023 | 09:17 PM
  #8  
_zebra's Avatar
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 456
From: cold & windy
Default

upsizing after a choke point only makes the exhaust note deeper.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TURBHOE
FORCED INDUCTION
17
Oct 30, 2009 09:42 AM
TURBHOE
FORCED INDUCTION
41
Jun 16, 2008 05:23 AM
JakeBrakeIH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
12
Mar 4, 2008 09:35 PM
Dark Halo
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
15
Mar 4, 2005 03:48 PM
ohohsilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
Oct 11, 2004 06:22 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.