3” y pipe to 3.5 exhaust ?
#1
So my set up so far is Ls3 480, 1 3/4 long tubes, 3” y pipe. My question, is there any benefit increasing the single exhaust pipe diameter after the y merge?
Thank you in advance
Thank you in advance
#3
You mean like not creating a choke point? That merge is your problem. I currently have a nearly stock 4.8L and cut off the stock collector and went dual 2.5" all the way, and there was a HUGE difference, especially up top. Now it just keeps climbing smoothly all the way.
I remember doing the math on here and I calculated my exhaust (being the OD - wall thickness and then getting cross area). Dual 2.5" is within 1% of a single 3.5".
Here:
(If a 2.5" pipe is measured by OD. 16g steel is .0625" thick. (x2 = .125" thick, 2.5" - .125 = 2.375" ID. 2.375/2 = 1.1875 radius. Pi R sq = 4.43 sq inches of ID area.
3" pipe - .125 = 2.875". /2 = 1.4375 x Pi R sq = 6.49 sq in of ID area.
3.5" pipe - .125 = 3.375 /2 = 1.6875 x Pi R sq = 8.946 sq in.
dual 2.5" pipe is (4.43 x 2 =) 8.86 sq in.
A 3.5" pipe volume is 1% greater than dual 2.5".
For a 3" pipe with 16g walls, = 6.491 sq inches of cross area (for dual 3" pipes = 12.982 sq in" of total cross area).
A 4" pipe is 4" - .125 total wall thickness for ID = 3.875 /2 = 1.9375 Radius
(1.9375)squared x pi = 11.793 sq in" of total cross area.
You have bends in there that are reducing the flow, but a single 3.5" can only flow 68% of what a dual 3.0" can do.
if that was me, I'm doing a dual 3" to a 4" collector, or even a 4 1/2" collector, or more likely getting rid of that merge and just running dual 3" all the way. If it's an air pump, why would you create a blockage, or a choke point to block air?
I remember doing the math on here and I calculated my exhaust (being the OD - wall thickness and then getting cross area). Dual 2.5" is within 1% of a single 3.5".
Here:
(If a 2.5" pipe is measured by OD. 16g steel is .0625" thick. (x2 = .125" thick, 2.5" - .125 = 2.375" ID. 2.375/2 = 1.1875 radius. Pi R sq = 4.43 sq inches of ID area.
3" pipe - .125 = 2.875". /2 = 1.4375 x Pi R sq = 6.49 sq in of ID area.
3.5" pipe - .125 = 3.375 /2 = 1.6875 x Pi R sq = 8.946 sq in.
dual 2.5" pipe is (4.43 x 2 =) 8.86 sq in.
A 3.5" pipe volume is 1% greater than dual 2.5".
For a 3" pipe with 16g walls, = 6.491 sq inches of cross area (for dual 3" pipes = 12.982 sq in" of total cross area).
A 4" pipe is 4" - .125 total wall thickness for ID = 3.875 /2 = 1.9375 Radius
(1.9375)squared x pi = 11.793 sq in" of total cross area.
You have bends in there that are reducing the flow, but a single 3.5" can only flow 68% of what a dual 3.0" can do.
if that was me, I'm doing a dual 3" to a 4" collector, or even a 4 1/2" collector, or more likely getting rid of that merge and just running dual 3" all the way. If it's an air pump, why would you create a blockage, or a choke point to block air?
#4
If I’ve already created the choke point with the 3” y pipe, I should just do a single 3” pipe into a good muffler and dump at rear bumper. Correct?
i know it’s not the perfect setup for top end but, will it at least help with low to mid range torque?
i know it’s not the perfect setup for top end but, will it at least help with low to mid range torque?
#5
You will be fine with the 3” all the way out. Like mentioned earlier, you would need larger diameter headers to make any real beneficial gains from a larger exhaust downstream. I made over 500 rwhp with 1 7/8” headers to a y pipe to the factory exhaust with a magnaflow muffler.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dark Halo
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
15
Mar 4, 2005 03:48 PM
ohohsilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
Oct 11, 2004 06:22 PM









