GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Is a 220r enough

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 01:34 PM
  #31  
bowty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Sounds good, thanks Beau!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 03:26 PM
  #32  
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 1
Default

Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 05:26 PM
  #33  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

I think you should go with a 3600 converter and the 220R, then add heads in the future. Go big with the converter, not the cam.

I love the way my truck runs with a 224 cammed 6.0 and 3400 converter(37" tires/4.56's).
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 08:38 PM
  #34  
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

this is all just what I have learned with a lifted truck. its just my opinion and a lot of people will disagree
gears and converter get ride of the height of tire, power and torque take care of the weight.
so I have lots of gear and converter to get the rpms up quick and I shift at 6700 and don't drop much under 5500 to stay in the power. seems to work very well for my light to light runs that I like to do, makes it a beast for street racing when I can get it to hook.
lots will disagree with my thinking but my truck would surprise a lot of you for a little 5.3. I am however swapping to a 6L for the torque that my heavy truck really needs
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blwn99x
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Apr 18, 2015 04:19 PM
GM1697
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
43
Feb 16, 2015 01:51 PM
jdelp
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
7
Jan 11, 2014 12:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.