04' Sierra VHO
Sep 7, 2004 | 08:33 PM
#32
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
i believe him, due to a red vho that ran a 14.7 at 92 stock against me, all i can say is they're quick for a extended cab truck later, kevin
P.S. his 60' was 2.18 on 20" rims stock
P.S. his 60' was 2.18 on 20" rims stock
Sep 7, 2004 | 09:17 PM
#33
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: League City, TX
Thanks for all the info, lots of options to think about. I will try to get down to Baytown and look some of you up, would be nice to run it before mods to see the difference.
By the way if any of you are getting a popping noise from the front end, there is a bulletin out on the front cross member(torsion bar suspension only).
By the way if any of you are getting a popping noise from the front end, there is a bulletin out on the front cross member(torsion bar suspension only).
Sep 8, 2004 | 03:07 AM
#35
On The Tree
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: newport beach, ca
Originally Posted by 6.0 badd ***
superchip/single flowmaster/throttle body spacer/asp pulley,
my 60ft with 20's 2.14/ 2.17 my 1/4 mile 14.0/14.1
my 60ft with nitto 245-50-16 are 1.9/ 2.0 my 1/8 mile 8.7/ 8.8
my 1/4 mile 13.7/ 13.8
i see everyone live's in texas come to the track and prove me wrong
my 60ft with 20's 2.14/ 2.17 my 1/4 mile 14.0/14.1
my 60ft with nitto 245-50-16 are 1.9/ 2.0 my 1/8 mile 8.7/ 8.8
my 1/4 mile 13.7/ 13.8
i see everyone live's in texas come to the track and prove me wrong
Sep 8, 2004 | 08:48 AM
#39
TECH Addict
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Originally Posted by 6.0 badd ***
V/HO is a faster truck then the ss because it's not all wheel drive. extra weight for no reason and doesn't need all wheel drive. 3:73 gears over the ss 4:10