GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Crew Cab 3.23 to 3.73s

Old May 8, 2012 | 10:11 PM
  #1  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default Crew Cab 3.23 to 3.73s

I know by researching on here that most people go from 3.23s to 4.11s. Well, I probably would go 3.90s if I didn't already have a GM set of 3.73s that cam out of my 1990 truck. The question is, what should I expect as far as mpg, probably decrease on the hwy about one mpg but city will probably go up as the truck is not struggling to get off the line as much. This is not my race truck, just a daily driver that I need a bit more towing from and performance. And since I already have the 3.73s and all I need is a install kit, then figured can't really beat that performance gain either way.

So, what are y'alls thoughts?

The truck is a 2007 Classic Crew cab 5.3L with SS 20" wheels on 285/50R20 tires. Probably will be going down do a 275/45R20 or 265/50R20 in a year when I do a 2/4 drop.
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
mcfarlnd's Avatar
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 10
From: DFW
Default

I went from 3.23 to 3.73s in my truck. The difference was pretty dramatic on the highway and stop and go traffic. I could go 500 miles to a tank before the swap at 80 mph straight highway. Now I get 420 on a good day at the same speed. Stop and go traffic took a lot less effort and didn't quite stall up as much but, the gas mileage just about stayed the same.
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 11:02 PM
  #3  
wld1985's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Wish I could get 400/500 miles to a tank in my 4.8 crew cab with 3.23's... Im only getting around 240ish..I do,do alot of stop and go though..
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 11:41 PM
  #4  
robert85's Avatar
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Gulfport, MS
Default

My crewcab performed pretty well with 3.73's but I couldn't really compare to the 3.23, for they were already in the truck lol.
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 12:46 PM
  #5  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default

Right now, I average about 320-330 miles per 17-18 gallons of fuel so about 18.5 - 19 mpg.
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 09:20 AM
  #6  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default

Anybody else have input?

I know its going to perform better and feel better just driving it around. Most of my driving is 50-65mph.
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 10:57 AM
  #7  
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

I just went from 3.42 to 3.90 and the difference is noticeable, both in cruising speed rpm and ease of acceleration. Haven't hammered on it yet. However, in the short time (100 miles) they have been in, I have seen about 1mpg better in town.
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
TXSZ66AVLANCHE's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 2
Default

I don't think the gear from a 90 model will work
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
mcfarlnd's Avatar
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 10
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by TXSZ66AVLANCHE
I don't think the gear from a 90 model will work
They will. I used some from a 94
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #10  
mcfarlnd's Avatar
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 10
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by YenkoST
Anybody else have input?

I know its going to perform better and feel better just driving it around. Most of my driving is 50-65mph.
My input not good enough for you
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.