FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why is everyone METH HEADS here???

Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Toomnymods
why would you want to spray pre-turbo? don't you need that heat to spool the turbo?
i always thought you'd want to spray if after..

where would the best place be for a remote mount?
Not on the turbine side, on the compressor side From the reading I've done, your cooling at the source of the heat so it's most effective, and also helps seal the turbo so it's a little more efficient
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #12  
Rocket468's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default

Yeap that's the benefit from meth injection when spraying at the wheel. Start cooling right at the source where all the heat is created .

I just recommend having a quality turbo in a nut shell you are spraying liquid on a hot metal part so the goal of the game is to start before the wheel is red hot. and also use a small enought nozzle and enought meth in the mix so you don't damage anything.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 03:17 AM
  #13  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

If you do it before the compressor make sure you spray some well atomized dropplets. You start throwing some liquid meth at blades spinning 70,000+ RPM your gonna be looking for a new turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #14  
Compressor Surge's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Mackinaw, IL
Default

If you are using it simply for cooling, then you cannot beat 100% water. It has a higher latent heat of vaporization than methanol, and it's CHEAP

Works fantastic on my NON-INTERCOOLED setup. Without the water, at the top of a 2nd gear pull, my IATs are around 210F. With ONLY water spraying, and no intercooler, my IATs are ~130 after the same pull.

You can see in this pic where I am injecting the water. It's just before the first orange silicone boot, right in the compressor outlet.

Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 03:06 PM
  #15  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by denali_on_26's
Why is everyone METH HEADS here??? ... and i think Meth is only one more thing to go wrong ...
I'm in full agreementship with the above inoculation. My reliance is heavily reliant on a double-sized reliable air-to-air inter cooler. When the cooling medium it requires relinquishes, the running of my engine will retire. I sure miss the octane boost that methanol provides, though.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #16  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

[QUOTE=Compressor Surge;4448886]If you are using it simply for cooling, then you cannot beat 100% water. It has a higher latent heat of vaporization than methanol, and it's CHEAP

Works fantastic on my NON-INTERCOOLED setup. Without the water, at the top of a 2nd gear pull, my IATs are around 210F. With ONLY water spraying, and no intercooler, my IATs are ~130 after the same pull.

You can see in this pic where I am injecting the water. It's just before the first orange silicone boot, right in the compressor outlet.

QUOTE]

Mines not a truley fair comparison, but when I added meth my IAT's stayed ambient at 9lbs of boost. instead of like a 25* change
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #17  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by kbracing96
No, meth doesn't spool a turbo like N2O. It just a fuel, not a oxidizer that accelerates combustion

It's used mostly for cooling IMO
Would or would it not, if sprayed before the turbo inlet be considered a "quasi" oxidizer as well as a fuel. As its cooling effect pre-turbo would have the added benefit of creating a denser charge to compress, therefore netting a greater volume of O2 content post turbo? Just a thought....

Agree though, it's greatest benefit is cooling the charge post compressor!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 05:04 PM
  #18  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

While I agree that it IS one more system to break down or need maintenance it is a necessary evil when pushing the limits of compression with street fuel, expecially in states with lessor quality in the name of emmision control
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #19  
Compressor Surge's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Mackinaw, IL
Default

20 million Turbo Buick guys can't be wrong.....

LOL
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 07:35 PM
  #20  
Rocket468's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default

i have done tons of testing. IMO an 50/50 mix is the best mix where you can get the benifits of both worlds.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.