FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Who has ran Both- PD blower and a turbo? Not together

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2017 | 02:06 PM
  #71  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

What about converting to a Dominator computer?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2017 | 03:49 PM
  #72  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
You are really going to spend $5k+ when all of this is because you aren't happy with a $400 TB? You probably have the most issue at 70% throttle range as that is probably where the blade has the most drag and stresses the motor the most (peak coefficient of lift on the blade due to the angle of attack of the air before it stalls).
70 to 80% and 5000 RPM is the trigger point. But it's not just that, it's having the full intention before I even started this of upgrading to something once the new motor was in. Even in my engine build thread I clearly state that a turbo is most likely in the plans. My set up is basically maxed out, I am not going to dump more into it only to be in the same position.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2017 | 03:59 PM
  #73  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
What about converting to a Dominator computer?
That's a lot of coin to spend to still be maxed out when a factory pcm will control way more then I am at. Cable driven or blow through.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 05:28 AM
  #74  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Well I have talked with a couple site sponsors that do turbo setups and it seems if properly sized I would be just as well off with a Single, so maybe that's the way Ill look to go. What intake manifold does everyone suggest? I am leaning to going right to the Hi Ram, I have a TBSS intake I can use but Ill need different fuel rails for it as the injector angle is different then most aftermarket intakes. My fuel lines are -8 so naturally Ill be needing aftermarket rails with whatever setup so I cant just toss on the TBSS intake.


I already have 4" exhaust so Ill just hook the down pipe up to my existing exhaust, I imagine its going to be much quieter with a turbo.

I just have to sell my blower first. Decisions, Decisions.

Anyone wanna buy a TVS2300 with every mod already done to it and about 3500 miles on it?
Could you send me a PM of everything you would sell with the 2300 blower and a ball park price of what you might want for it? which TVS is it? Front drive, jack shaft drive, port configuration etc....
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 09:26 AM
  #75  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
That's a lot of coin to spend to still be maxed out when a factory pcm will control way more then I am at. Cable driven or blow through.
I thought your throttle issue was in the PCM when skimmed through the posts. I figured you could spend the $5000 for a Dominator setup so you could keep your $400 throttle and blower setup.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 09:38 AM
  #76  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

If you wanted to bandaid the problem, you could just make your pedal position discontinuous with throttle position. Instead of commanding 70-80% throttle position, skip from 60-90 or 60-100. Not exactly desirable and I'm sure you're past the point of considering that, but if the throttle manufacturer uses a motor too weak for the flow then that's an option.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 10:52 AM
  #77  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

I have considered it briefly but don't like the idea. To me that's a band aide. The LS2 throttlebody works like a champ and always has, but to spin this thing max it needs a 102.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2017 | 11:05 AM
  #78  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

So what are normal egt's on a gas setup at wide open? I am used to diesels, what egt is too hot?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2017 | 11:23 AM
  #79  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

My turbo setup was outrageous by most standards. Autometer 2000F sensor right before the turbine inlet. Idle - 850F, cruise - 1400F, WOT - 2000F+ (finished a run before it ever leveled out and rose over 500 degrees in a few seconds usually).

Blower setup with probe near header collector, idle - 750F, cruise - 1100F, WOT - 1400F.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2017 | 11:45 AM
  #80  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

The glitch with egt in one location at the turbo.
Exhaust is stacking up.
You can get hi egt with over fueling as easy as lean.
Move the timing around can also change the egt.
Watching widebands are more accurate to me.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.