FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

thinkin of rear mounted turbo ..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 07:45 AM
  #1  
gallo-lo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: ny LI 495.
Default thinkin of rear mounted turbo ..

Lq9 rear mounted turbo ,82mm t6 1.82 ar no backpresure to reach 16lbs boost..

Has anyone in this forum try rear mounted set up???
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #2  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

There are several that have or had rear mounted turbos.
That is one big A/R should be interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 12:46 PM
  #3  
chevrolet all the way's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 0
From: trussville alabama
Default

im running a rear mounted s400 75 with the 1.10 i believe is the size ar. it wasnt easy to get the kit going, but its not too bad. spools fine and rolls out!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
2ktransam's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke Va
Default

I had a rear mount on my truck for a couple of years before I moved it up front. If you have the space up front I would do a front mount. I liked the rear mount ok but it doesn't spool near as well as the front mount. That big exhaust housing will be hard to spool even on a 6.0L.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 03:01 PM
  #5  
bk_cauley's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Thomasville, ga
Default

Im running one and even with a .68 housing spool isnt optimal. If i had any goals to make bigger power i would just front mount it. I rear mounted it because i was on a budget at the time and did it all myself and already had a oil pump.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
gallo-lo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: ny LI 495.
Default

Thanks guys!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 03:40 PM
  #7  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

I loved my sts 67mm but I knew it was limited from the start. I just did mine because it was emissions legal and I know Texas heat is a killer for a DD. I sure as hell had fun beating people up with it. It had 7.40s in it but didn't get to prove it.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2013 | 04:15 PM
  #8  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

i ran the sts kit for a few years.. the new front mount with a S475/83 1.0 spools faster than the rear mount 60mm did and i like it alot more than the rear mount.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #9  
slowec's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Ga
Default

Started out rear mount as well. Oil return pumps and issues make me worry. Front mount is mo better. Rear was a fun start though.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2013 | 01:21 AM
  #10  
Ali 556's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

why not a smallish front mount and huge like 106mm turbo as rear mount? crazy power and crazy piping is needed
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.