FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Radix Mod.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
03tahoe22's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, Florida
Default Radix Mod.

I am currently running a 3.4 pulley and Badly in need of an upgrade! What do you think the Horsepower, Torque, 1/4 mile difference will be between a 3.2 pulley or a 3.0 pullley with headers, both will be running around 8psi since I have heard you loose 2psi with headers. Is it worth it to buy the longtubes for the cost ($525 OBX) or will I see the small differnce? I know tunning is going to be needed and dont want to do the pulley have it tuned then add the headers and have to have it retuned.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #2  
chevrolade's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: pearsall.tx
Default

Im in the same situation,im running a 3.90 pulley at 5-6 psi,im going o install a 3.70 for 8lbs as well-they say for every .10 you go down its like 15hp.good luck man
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #3  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1
From: SE TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by 03tahoe22
I am currently running a 3.4 pulley and Badly in need of an upgrade! What do you think the Horsepower, Torque, 1/4 mile difference will be between a 3.2 pulley or a 3.0 pullley with headers, both will be running around 8psi since I have heard you loose 2psi with headers. Is it worth it to buy the longtubes for the cost ($525 OBX) or will I see the small differnce? I know tunning is going to be needed and dont want to do the pulley have it tuned then add the headers and have to have it retuned.
What engine size? Which blower? 112,112HH,122?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #4  
03tahoe22's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, Florida
Default

Mods in Signature.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1
From: SE TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by 03tahoe22
Mods in Signature.
Dam.....I swear I looked. The 3" pulley with long tubes won't over boost you. Will need a tune though. A boost cooler would be a nice addition. You'll be around 9psi. No need to do one then the other. I don't know the HP increase, but I do know you'll like it!!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #6  
1989k1500's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, MI
Default

You should get quite a gain by adding long tubes and pulleying down.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:31 AM
  #7  
Doobie's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Roch. NY.
Default

My truck mods are similar to your own. I have LT's with my Radix and am currently running a 3.3" pulley and seeing 7.5~8 psi at wot.. LT's will help with efficiency and a good tune will be a must to realize the full gains.
Oh yeah...it will be a lot louder too! Adding high flow cats will help with the noise a lot too.
DO IT!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #8  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

5.3 with a 3.0" pulley and long tubes would be sweet! You'll probably be around 10-11 psi though, not 8.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550
5.3 with a 3.0" pulley and long tubes would be sweet! You'll probably be around 10-11 psi though, not 8.
Yes. True. I make between 172-182kPa with the 3" pulley, depending on weather, a solid 175kPa average. (175Kpa=10.7lbs at sea level)
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #10  
03tahoe22's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, Florida
Default

How much less performance will i get by just going to a 3.2 pulley and not putting on the headers?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bagged7104SS
GM Parts Classifieds
23
Sep 24, 2015 08:42 PM
therock
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
4
Jul 25, 2015 09:23 AM
sTNT971
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Jul 16, 2015 12:39 PM
tbyrne
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Oct 27, 2003 02:46 PM
SSHOTRODSCOM
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
Aug 5, 2002 01:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.