FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Positive Displacement Blower Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012, 02:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (59)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Positive Displacement Blower Options

What are the positive displacement blower options available out there today; such as MP112, TVS1900, TVS2300, Kenne Belle, etc? A quick list would be great. There seems to be many options available these days, and the sticky hasn't been updated in more than 3 years.

I'm on the fence between one of these or a turbo for my '01 Silverado. Leaning towards turbo right now, but the instant torque of a blower is tempting.

Thanks!
Old 04-18-2012, 02:34 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
TXBlownTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TVS 2300 if you want to go big, or run low boost and be a sleeper. 8-10lbs should get you to the 500rwhp range.
Old 04-18-2012, 02:43 PM
  #3  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 373 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

You need to be specific about your goals...

If you only want 8-10lbs a tvs1900 will be better and more responsive than the 2300.
Old 04-18-2012, 03:36 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (59)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My goal is a list of PD blowers out there that will bolt onto a cathedral or rectangular port LSx engine. That way I can research my options on here and ls1tech and not waste your guys' time
Old 04-18-2012, 04:45 PM
  #5  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,252
Received 373 Likes on 254 Posts
Default

Wheres the fun in that?

Magnacharger:
old:
mp112
mp122
new:
tvs1900
tvs2300 (front and jackshaft drive versions)

whipple:
2.3L
2.9L

KB:
2.3L
2.9L I know at least one person has done this but it was a ton of work since the blower is meant for a camaro.

eldelbrock has their tvs2300 look alike, along with slp
Old 04-18-2012, 05:29 PM
  #6  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Vortech also offers a PD blower, it appears very similar to a whipple unit.
Old 04-18-2012, 06:25 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Roush had their TVS1900 GM truck kits briefly.

If you're on a budget, I would go MP112. If you are patient, I bet you could pick one up for $2500 (versus $4000 for a used TVS1900). With the $1500 you save you can buy blower cam ($700 total), China stainless LT's ($500), and tune ($300) and run circles around the TVS1900.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:15 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
TXBlownTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Roush, junk, period. Pound for pound the 2300 puts down more power, will have lower IAT's and be more driveable. I'm saying this from experience having gone from a TVS 1900 @ 5 lbs, to 7, 10, 12, then the 2300 from 14 to 17lbs. Go with a 2300. You will have room to grow. As far as a 1900 being more "responsive," I beg to differ.
Old 04-19-2012, 05:18 AM
  #9  
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
TIM Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: OH IO :(
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXBlownTBSS
Roush, junk, period. Pound for pound the 2300 puts down more power, will have lower IAT's and be more driveable. I'm saying this from experience having gone from a TVS 1900 @ 5 lbs, to 7, 10, 12, then the 2300 from 14 to 17lbs. Go with a 2300. You will have room to grow. As far as a 1900 being more "responsive," I beg to differ.
I beg to differ with you too. How can you actually say the roush is junk?? Where are your facts on this??
Old 04-19-2012, 05:46 AM
  #10  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,738
Received 202 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

For a 5.3, the 1900 will be more responsive for low boost. As for the Roush blowers being junk, I'd say Tim's truck running mid 11s with one negates that statement all together. Not to mention, different boost levels makes comparing the two blowers a waste of time. Don't be brash; it isn't well-accepted in these parts.


Quick Reply: Positive Displacement Blower Options



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.