Porting an Eaton
#4
there is absolutely no advantage to what has been done there.....Looks pretty and causes turbulance in the inlet. EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger.....We have seen the result of the porting jobs in our re manufacturing dept, not a positive thing.
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
#5
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
there is absolutely no advantage to what has been done there.....Looks pretty and causes turbulance in the inlet. EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger.....We have seen the result of the porting jobs in our re manufacturing dept, not a positive thing.
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
I guess thats a "hint hint"...... Dont port your blowers
#6
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger....
Last edited by dewmanshu; Nov 18, 2005 at 01:30 PM.
#7
[QUOTE=dewmanshu]
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger....QUOTE]
millions...boy...that would explain the price tag eh?
millions...boy...that would explain the price tag eh?

Trending Topics
#8
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
there is absolutely no advantage to what has been done there.....Looks pretty and causes turbulance in the inlet. EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger.....We have seen the result of the porting jobs in our re manufacturing dept, not a positive thing.
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
#9
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
there is absolutely no advantage to what has been done there.....Looks pretty and causes turbulance in the inlet. EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger.....We have seen the result of the porting jobs in our re manufacturing dept, not a positive thing.
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
with your huffers
I've seen gains on both the MP112 and the Radix from cleaning it up i.e.(light porting). And yes if its done poorly it will hurt performance and turn your case in to a large paper weight. The Radix will see smaller porting gains because of its more effiecent rear inlet.A weak link in the Radix setup if the inlet track before the blower and the stock throttle body MAF assembly...
#10
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
there is absolutely no advantage to what has been done there.....Looks pretty and causes turbulance in the inlet. EATON spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours desiging that supercharger.....We have seen the result of the porting jobs in our re manufacturing dept, not a positive thing.
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
BTW the Magnuson 112 is better than what you are looking at (even the "porting" job)
I would think if this was more hurtful than helpful... the Ford community would have been screaming a long time ago.So what exactly is the "result" of porting an Eaton... as seen in your reman dept?
BTW, I have installed a few of your C5 and Radix kits... VERY well engineered... and IMO, a decent price for what you get.
Bill
Last edited by billreid1@cox.net; Nov 18, 2005 at 08:14 PM.






