New Eaton TVS Supercharged Motor
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:18 PM
#81
13 Second Truck Club
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
How many other ways do i need to put it. THE TVS WILL NOT BE GOOD ON YOUR STOCK MOTOR. If you have plans to build a forged 402 or bigger, then yes it might be for you. Some folks need to the the "bigger is better" theory out of their heads. We are not advertising something you cant have, its around the corner.....but its more than most will ever realize the true potential of.
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:19 PM
#82
On the one hand we want to know about all the new technology, and on the other hand we can't seem to wait for it to come out. As you know, things take time to develop properly. Sounds like you are of the mindset to wait until the TVS comes out, I see no problem with that.
LOL, I don't really appreciate you calling my MP122HH old technology before I even get it running though
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:20 PM
#83
Not trying to come off like a dick.....but you are driving a point that I understand......Yes, the TVS is a bigger better blower than the 112 or the 122, but you wont see its true potential on a stock motor....so why wait? Sorry if I offended you.....toughen up, its the internet 
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:23 PM
#84
13 Second Truck Club
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:26 PM
#85
we are all anxiously awaiting the TVS
As soon as Jerry Magnuson feels it's ready for production and has been thoroughly tested I'm sure we'll see it shortly thereafter
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:27 PM
#86
13 Second Truck Club
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Not trying to come off like a dick.....but you are driving a point that I understand......Yes, the TVS is a bigger better blower than the 112 or the 122, but you wont see its true potential on a stock motor....so why wait? Sorry if I offended you.....toughen up, its the internet
So @ 7-8 psi you are saying that a MP112 or 122 produces a cooler charge or is more efficient than the new stuff on a 6.2L/376? I have to see something on paper that's just hard to belive that they would go backwards in terms of technology from the outside looking in.... I'm all ears and ready to learn though!
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:29 PM
#87
So @ 7-8 psi you are saying that a MP112 or 122 produces a cooler charge or is more efficient than the new stuff on a 6.2L/376? I have to see something on paper that's just hard to belive that they would go backwards in terms of technology from the outside looking in.... I'm all ears and ready to learn though!
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:32 PM
#88
13 Second Truck Club
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:34 PM
#89
Oct 17, 2007 | 10:36 PM
#90
So @ 7-8 psi you are saying that a MP112 or 112 produces a cooler charge or is more efficient than the new stuff on a 6.2L/376? I have to see something on paper that that's just hard to belive that they would gp backwards in terms of technology from the outside looking in.... I'm all ears and ready to learn though!
Most are fixated on the terms that most are....IAT's, cooler charge....bigger blower....and I can understand that, it does make perfect sense to the guy that has not driven, tested, seen, and analyzed the data from the two different set ups.
For your 6.2L with the L92 heads, the MP122 would be a dead ringer for you.....more than that motor at that compression ratio with pump gas can handle
At Magna Charger, we are focused on supercharging for the long term, we are not interested in getting a call from you in 6 months about your blown up motor(ala TITAN)........However the after hours thoughts are always on the MAXIMUM performance.....and we can and will be playing with the big boys soon enough.i am off to bed.....