MP122 Proof in the Puddin!
#43
Originally Posted by BigTex
IMO, the best thing about these blowers is the part throttle response and the ability to get as much power as you want when you want it. I'd rather have too much torque than have to wait on power to build up. On a streetable / driver truck or heavy SUV, all that torque down low is really great.
I like to have that "electric motor smooth" linear power that the positive displacement blowers make. Daily driving is not just a peasure, it's always fun.
One of the big things that gets heavy vehicles moving quick is torque. Quick torque is what the positive blowers produce and the 122 Magnusson will hang onto that torque further up the rpm range. As Richard mentioned above, the positive blowers don't require large throttle inputs to deliver suitable amounts of torque and over day in day out driving it gets less tiring not having to wind up an engine in each gear from a stop light. The next objective is to keep the transmissions from expiring.Richard
#45
You can see a video of that and more here . You're going to have to do some clicking, but it's there.
On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
#46
Originally Posted by zippy
You can see a video of that and more here . You're going to have to do some clicking, but it's there.
On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
#47
Originally Posted by Blown2300
all (most) magnusson kits have the throttle body in the front.. they just move the pulley to the rear.
#48
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by philntx
For full size GM trucks the TB is on the side, using an elbow to pull in air from the rear of the blower. I believe that Zippy was wondering about a direct comparison between the blower with the J-tube and the front inlet blower.
I am not sure what happened to the video, I will find out whats up on monday.
#49
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
#50
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by zippy
The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
**note** if you pay attention you can see the manifold air temp readings and they do not fluctuate more than 10* +/-
Last edited by BlownChevy; Sep 15, 2007 at 10:42 AM. Reason: came off like a dick.....sorry




