FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MP122 Proof in the Puddin!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #41  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
Cody - I do understand what you are saying but.......nah, nevermind.
Glad we see eye to eye
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #42  
yurs78's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Juda
Default

WTF!!! Where's the video it's been removed, can it be posted again? Love to see what you're talking about.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #43  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
IMO, the best thing about these blowers is the part throttle response and the ability to get as much power as you want when you want it. I'd rather have too much torque than have to wait on power to build up. On a streetable / driver truck or heavy SUV, all that torque down low is really great.
+1

I like to have that "electric motor smooth" linear power that the positive displacement blowers make. Daily driving is not just a peasure, it's always fun. One of the big things that gets heavy vehicles moving quick is torque. Quick torque is what the positive blowers produce and the 122 Magnusson will hang onto that torque further up the rpm range. As Richard mentioned above, the positive blowers don't require large throttle inputs to deliver suitable amounts of torque and over day in day out driving it gets less tiring not having to wind up an engine in each gear from a stop light. The next objective is to keep the transmissions from expiring.

Richard
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 11:15 PM
  #44  
custom 68's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: springfield MO
Default

did anybody keep this? I had to wait till I got home and now itis gone
any help
Dave
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 03:51 AM
  #45  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

You can see a video of that and more here . You're going to have to do some clicking, but it's there.

On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 06:48 AM
  #46  
Blown2300's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
You can see a video of that and more here . You're going to have to do some clicking, but it's there.

On the third pull it made 670hp. I'd still be interested to see how much boost is gained in having the front entry throttle body. I'd also like to know what the pulley ratio's were. The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
all (most) magnusson kits have the throttle body in the front.. they just move the pulley to the rear.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #47  
philntx's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Blown2300
all (most) magnusson kits have the throttle body in the front.. they just move the pulley to the rear.
For full size GM trucks the TB is on the side, using an elbow to pull in air from the rear of the blower. I believe that Zippy was wondering about a direct comparison between the blower with the J-tube and the front inlet blower.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #48  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by philntx
For full size GM trucks the TB is on the side, using an elbow to pull in air from the rear of the blower. I believe that Zippy was wondering about a direct comparison between the blower with the J-tube and the front inlet blower.
There is not THAT much of a loss IF you use the 90mm TB on high boost (over 9 psi) applications.
I am not sure what happened to the video, I will find out whats up on monday.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #49  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

http://www.gmsvideos.com/video_detail.php?mId=1946
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #50  
BlownChevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
The heat issue show's up a bit by the third dyno run, but like I'd said in another post, the heat issue isn't going to show up that bad during a dyno run. Either way, it's a bad *** 700hp Trailblazer.
The "heat" issue you keep referring too is what any engine is going to suffer from in a harsh environment. So the motor was down 40 or 50 horse after who knows how long and how many pulls.....and who knows if that was during a calibration change. You are ASSUMING that is was from back to back pulls and suffering from heat. The one thing I can say is I would lay my figs on the blower housing after each pull.....I would not touch a screw blower housing after a pull like that.

**note** if you pay attention you can see the manifold air temp readings and they do not fluctuate more than 10* +/-

Last edited by BlownChevy; Sep 15, 2007 at 10:42 AM. Reason: came off like a dick.....sorry
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.