FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MP112 or MP122 on 2008 5.3 ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

I have used the 122 on a 5.3l and it works great with a 3" pulley. About 12 psi with a 224 cam. This is also a front mount 90mm TB configuration.

Last edited by trever1t; Oct 17, 2008 at 03:36 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #12  
SimpleManLance's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Michigan
Default

this might also help you out.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=425976

Originally Posted by hellbents10
I have used the 122 on a 5.3l and it works great with a 3" pulley. About 12 psi with a 224 cam. This is also a front mount 90mm TB configuration.
whats the difference between the j tube and the front mount as far a performance?

so would the 3.0 pulley on the 5.3 with out a cam give it more or less boost? my guess would be more.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #13  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Never tried it with out a cam. Also Never tested back to back on the j-tube vs. front inlet but I would imagine the front inlet is more efficient. Team magna sales will step in and tell by how much pretty soon I am sure.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1
From: SE TEXAS
Default

The faster you spin the blower, the more boost you get. If you add mods to make the motor breathe easier, the boost will go down a bit, but the power generally goes up. A rear drive blower adds a couple of extra pulleys that can be used to spin the blower faster. From my understanding, the 122HH can be spun a little faster before it loses effeciency. A bigger blower spinning slower will probably be more effecient than a smaller one spinning at a faster rate. The smaller one will build heat quicker. High IAT's limit power.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
I have used the 122 on a 5.3l and it works great with a 3" pulley. About 12 psi with a 224 cam. This is also a front mount 90mm TB configuration.
What year 5.3 was it that you put the 122 on?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #16  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

06' 799 heads.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #17  
Midnightrider's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 495
Likes: 10
From: Celina, Tx
Default

i disagree with the rep go 122 and pully it high for less boost til you are ready for a built bottom end i wish i went 122 now im upgrading soon
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 07:28 PM
  #18  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

a 122 is too much blower for a stock 5.3.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 07:09 AM
  #19  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I'd say it depends on your goals. If you are looking to just bolt on a blower and a few bolt on's and call it good, go 112. If you are looking to do a cam, headers, etc. down the road go with the 122. This is important especially if you might even step up on cubes down the road. So many started with the 112 and ended up switching. Avoid the costly switch down the road. It might even be a consideration to go with the TVS 1900. Not very big, but better than the MP112. It has seemed that a 2psi gain as posted is common when going from the MP112 to the MP122. That's not a huge jump. Alot of guys run a D1SC on a 5.3L, a MP122 isn't out of reach for a 5.3L. Look at what Parish is doing with his "stock" 5.3L.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
D1SCSS
PROJECTS GALLERY
163
Jul 25, 2024 06:54 PM
mikeyjm1
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
17
Oct 29, 2015 11:04 PM
lsxmalibu
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Sep 9, 2015 11:08 PM
jrcabby
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Aug 24, 2015 09:40 AM
Bluchevypick
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
4
Aug 18, 2015 09:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.