FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

5.3 + maggie 122 + 90MM tb = good or not???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2008, 09:33 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SimpleManLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartland, Michigan
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3 + maggie 122 + 90MM tb = good or not???

at the moment i got a stock 5.3 in my truck. im on the quest for a reliable 12.5 or faster pass in my truck. how would a stock bolt on 5.3 run with a 122 at 9-10PSI? i know i will loose low end with the 122 over the 112 which will sorta suck because im running a 80E with a stock converter. but how much will i really loose? is it going to be a complete dog out of the hole? with the 122 over the 112 i should have lower iat temps because it isn't working as hard, right?

the reason im thinking the 122 over the 112 is because down the road i would like to build a 5.7 or a 6.0. and a lot of those guys are really spinning the 112 to get some boost. so im sorta tring to only spend my money once.


so please enlighten me on your thoughts on this setup?
Old 09-30-2008, 10:01 AM
  #2  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its hard enough to feed a 5.3l with a mp112 w/o super high IAT's. I would defiantly go with the 122 with out a second thought.
Old 09-30-2008, 10:15 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SimpleManLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartland, Michigan
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the reply.

what about the lowend loss? or the performance?
Old 09-30-2008, 10:15 AM
  #4  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Its hard enough to feed a 5.3l with a mp112 w/o super high IAT's. I would defiantly go with the 122 with out a second thought.
the MP112 and a small cam will make 500 RWHP on a 5.3. Not sure where you come off with that comment.
Old 09-30-2008, 10:16 AM
  #5  
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
 
Last Call's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,678
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

A 112 or 122 will get you past the 12.5 mark with the correct bolt ons.

Of course, the 122 would be better. I think the loss in low end is minimal.
Old 09-30-2008, 10:31 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SimpleManLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartland, Michigan
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Last Call
A 112 or 122 will get you past the 12.5 mark with the correct bolt ons.

Of course, the 122 would be better. I think the loss in low end is minimal.
bolt ons are in sig. and if i do a cam it will probably be the trucker cam
Old 09-30-2008, 10:40 AM
  #7  
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
 
Last Call's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,678
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SimpleManLance
bolt ons are in sig. and if i do a cam it will probably be the trucker cam
I would think a cam and meth kit will net over 500rwhp and a low 12 sec time slip. Not sure of the trucker cam specs. I use the gt2-3 in my 6.0. I have dynoed 500+ rwhp on 3 different dynos and have 4-5 passes right around 12.1. Traction and more tuning would probably get me an all boost 11.
Old 09-30-2008, 11:02 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
SimpleManLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartland, Michigan
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BTW blownchevy you have a PM.

Originally Posted by Last Call
I would think a cam and meth kit will net over 500rwhp and a low 12 sec time slip. Not sure of the trucker cam specs. I use the gt2-3 in my 6.0. I have dynoed 500+ rwhp on 3 different dynos and have 4-5 passes right around 12.1. Traction and more tuning would probably get me an all boost 11.
trucker cam is 216/224 .551 115lsa
Old 09-30-2008, 11:02 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Diablo666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

last call: Are you getting these numbers with a 112 or a 122?
Old 09-30-2008, 11:14 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think a 122 would be right at home with a 5.3L. I doubt you'd even notice a difference in low rpm.


Quick Reply: 5.3 + maggie 122 + 90MM tb = good or not???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.