FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MP T-70 vs MP T-76

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 01:35 AM
  #1  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Thread Starter
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default MP T-70 vs MP T-76

After running the 70 with .96 a/r on my 5.3 I do think it would do fine on more cubic inches..... However..... How far out of effeciency rance would it be at say 15psi on a 5.7L motor?

I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 02:40 AM
  #2  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

with a mild 2001 zo6 cam on a 5.3 the mp70 is done at 14psi. going from 14psi to 18psi gives no extra power. i would think on a 5.7 the turbo would be done at 12-13psi and on a 6.0 even sooner.

i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.

i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 03:58 AM
  #3  
slow67's Avatar
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 1
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
with a mild 2001 zo6 cam on a 5.3 the mp70 is done at 14psi. going from 14psi to 18psi gives no extra power. i would think on a 5.7 the turbo would be done at 12-13psi and on a 6.0 even sooner.

i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.

i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
Do you think a bigger turbine would have helped? I remember the backpressure was pretty high....
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #4  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

i had a .96. i dont think a larger exhaust housing would have helped much. if you look at a compresor map for a t76 it was running out of air right where you would expect it to.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #5  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

That's exactly what I just went through and have on my truck now, but i won't really be able to do any real testing on it till spring and I have the 80e in the truck. I don't want to brake the 65E, The MP T76 spools just a bit slower then the 70, both have the p-trim wheel and .96 housing, but that's what I expected it to do since it is a fair bit bigger compressor. It's still plenty fast, don't get me wrong. It does feel a bit stronger and more efficient, but I'm only running 9 psi in high boost right now, which is like 7 PSI at sea-level. This spring it WILL get put though some serious testing at 15-18 psi, .

Here is a comparison pic...

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #6  
Bill Reid's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
After running the 70 with .96 a/r on my 5.3 I do think it would do fine on more cubic inches..... However..... How far out of effeciency rance would it be at say 15psi on a 5.7L motor?

I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
Is this a daily driver? What cam? What stall? If this is Weekend Warrior truck maybe go a little bigger. But if this is a daily driven street truck I might settle for a 76. FWIW, I plan on doing a 5.7L(LS6)/T76 combo as well.

Bill
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Thread Starter
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

Weekend /strip toy.... Ill be going from my current SS3600 converter to a PI 3000. The 5.7L longblock already has a GT2-3 cam and good heads but I'm considering changing it for a low 220s single pattern Isky turbo cam (definitely leaving the heads). It'll turn some 3.73s.

I am honestly not wanting to sink huge money into this thing for an upgrade which is why I'm sticking with a MP turbo. I COULD keep the 70, but I know it really wouldn't do it justice.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: West Union, OHIO
Default

Im boosting a 6.0 with ls6 cam and i was trying to figure out wich MP to go with my self. 70 or 76 Im not sure wich would be the one i need. Im wanting to run 10 to 12 psi.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Thread Starter
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

I'd say the 76 for sure for you.... That 70 would pretty well stay at max capacity on that motor at that boost level
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #10  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

Originally Posted by whippled HD
Im boosting a 6.0 with ls6 cam and i was trying to figure out wich MP to go with my self. 70 or 76 Im not sure wich would be the one i need. Im wanting to run 10 to 12 psi.
even a 76 is a little on the small side for a 6.0 expecialy in the 10-12psi range. 76 for sure.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.