FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Maximize mpg

Old Jan 22, 2012 | 04:25 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default

That's the things that i like to here, before and after mpg on mild setups not wanting to go extreme. I can show restraint with the gas pedal haha.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 04:50 PM
  #12  
black4.8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: OH
Default

don't drive mine often so i don't give i **** about mpg really, but did check it just out of curiosity and see around 2mpg to the better. if you tuned and drive for milage i'm sure you could 4+ better w/turbo. theres a thread on turbo for milage on here if you do search.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Everyone is talking just highway, average out your whole tank of fuel and see what the diff. is.

Apples to oranges. I can get 19.5mpg or so. Can I average that? Hell NO.

At 55 mph level road I get 17.5
At 72 Mph Level road I get 15.7
City driving only, about 8-9
Average per tank, usually in the 11's

Granted I have allot going against me, 4:10 gears, 2800 stall, AWD, more wieght, more cubes etc. Just realize there is allot more involved then just someone saying so and so got x amount more mpg. I dont doubt a mild turbo setup can get equal to or slightly better highway mpg, however average fuel economy I bet will still be less.

Last edited by 03sierraslt; Jan 22, 2012 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #14  
quicksilverado's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, Ga.
Default

With a stock 5.3 and turbo I got 18 in town and above 22 on the hwy running 80 mph.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default

No I was wandering about averaging a whole tank not by what the display says
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 10:35 PM
  #16  
Alpinestar's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Norman, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by bsmith98
No I was wandering about averaging a whole tank not by what the display says
That display is not that accurate, especially when you start changing stuff on your truck. I would go the turbo route but not necessarily with a "small" turbo. A 70mm Q-trim 1.0 a/r would be good because you could easily keep it out of boost. Once you hear the turbo whistle you will realize that your self control is not as good as you may have thought
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 11:51 PM
  #17  
brent1976's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
Default

Highway mine stayed about the same w/ the turbo on long trips that were all highway, around 18-18.5. Using a whole tank in town I get between 10-11, before it was 12-13. I average about 13 overall now, it used to be 14.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SS94S10
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Jan 3, 2019 01:57 PM
gaps
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
10
Oct 15, 2015 02:53 PM
turbo6c3
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:11 PM
01silvy
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
5
Sep 26, 2015 10:20 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Dodge Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Sep 11, 2015 03:32 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.