FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Maximize mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 09:36 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default Maximize mpg

What set up would maximize mpg for a ecsb z71 a small turbo kit 5-7 psi tuned for mpg or ported heads and a small cam tuned for mpg
Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 11:01 PM
  #2  
dmelvin's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 1
From: Rock Port, MO
Default

Neither... both setups will just make you grin and push the skinny peddle harder.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 11:15 PM
  #3  
6789olds's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 518
Likes: 3
From: santa paula ca
Default

i vote small turbo . but u will still have to keep your foot out of it .
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 02:58 AM
  #4  
kr1s's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 611
Likes: 4
From: Texas
Default

^^^ x's 2
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #5  
slammedsilvy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, Mo
Default

Out of those two options, I'd say a beater is your best bet.

A full size truck, forced induction, and good gas mileage. Those things don't tend to go together too well.

I'm all for forced induction or ported heads and a cam, but don't do it for gas mileage gains as you'll be grossly unsatisfied. Do it for the power increase and enjoy.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 12:35 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: IN
Default

Well i love driving my truck and right now it gets 15 mpg and if I could do either of the two and get 19 or 20 mpg I would be extremely happy
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 12:41 PM
  #7  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Originally Posted by bsmith98
Well i love driving my truck and right now it gets 15 mpg and if I could do either of the two and get 19 or 20 mpg I would be extremely happy
Its not going to happen. Forget the truck if you want 20 mpg and power. If you go the turbo route, you may be able to get just a tad better on the highway but your overall average will be worse. You can nit pick either option to death but the real world reality of it is that neither are going to get you 20mpg. I have ran setups NA and FI as well as different FI setups and that is just the way it is.

Also as others have already stated, you will push the go pedal more because its fun.

I gave up along time ago and got a DD, so I can do what I want with my truck and get 35-40mpg on my way to work.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 12:54 PM
  #8  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1
From: SE TEXAS
Default

If you drive a heads/cam motor easy and compare it to a supercharged stock motor easily driven, the supercharged motor will get better mpg. Now, I'm assuming your heads/cam setup has a big enough cam to give you a good power increase. Sure, with a tiny cam, you might be able to mpg decently. You won't get near the power vs an f/i setup though. In most cases, the power adder is just along for the ride if you don't use it. My supercharged truck did 550 at the wheels and would get 15 mpg if driven sanely. A heads/cam truck with 150 hp less won't do that.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #9  
black4.8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: OH
Default

ran the crap out of mine before and after turbo and get better mpg with it. its a lot harder not getting on it w/ turbo tho. small turbo gets my vote, plus turbo will make more power.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 01:47 PM
  #10  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Charcoldvowtie claimed he got a 4mpg gain with his sts system on his 4.8 ecsb.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.