FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gen-TT Truck Twin Turbo Kit

Old Aug 8, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #71  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by Street Tuna
Holy crap I just wet my pants. That's a pretty ingenious way to mount the turbo's. Makes me think of the HP turbo set-up for the corvette's mounted down low in that location. Are you gonna leave those dumped like that or are you gonna run true duel's out the back for the exhaust? Looks impressive...why wasn't this around when I was shopping for a turbo??
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #72  
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default

How is oil change without removal of that pipe under the oil pan?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #73  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

That's awesome! That's pretty much what I am/was going to build if and when I go with twins. My only concern is if larger turbos will fit there if you have a larger cubed engine. My turbo currently sits a little bit further back than the passenger (your driver's) side one. It works very well with factory manifolds and minimal piping. IMO, the only downside is having to run an oil pump.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #74  
WJ MARK's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Default

This is more similar to an sts kit than a frontmount IMHO. Still looks like there would be some issues with the 4wd guys. Im not too big on having extra to fail ex: oil pump.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #75  
agreif's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

So this is set up for factory manifolds right. Any aftermarket long tubes and the cit would have to be customized, right?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 04:19 AM
  #76  
Street Tuna's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Thats right, we use the factory manifolds, pointing the right way, and keep the heat out of the engine bay
We are hoping to see 500rwhp on lowish kinds of boost pressures < 10psi and will post the results from our Dyno Dynamics load dyno next week, along with final installation pictures
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #77  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
That's awesome! That's pretty much what I am/was going to build if and when I go with twins. My only concern is if larger turbos will fit there if you have a larger cubed engine. My turbo currently sits a little bit further back than the passenger (your driver's) side one. It works very well with factory manifolds and minimal piping. IMO, the only downside is having to run an oil pump.
thats how i was thinking of doing my twins as well. but im still up in air of custom logs or manis
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #78  
TG02Z71's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by WJ MARK
This is more similar to an sts kit than a frontmount IMHO. Still looks like there would be some issues with the 4wd guys. Im not too big on having extra to fail ex: oil pump.
Those turbos are just as close as they would be to the exhaust manifolds as an engine compartment install, and even closer than a single in the engine compartment would be. Looks like a fair amount of charge pipe but not too bad.
Must make a hell of a noise being right under the floor boards though!!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #79  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Street Tuna
Thats right, we use the factory manifolds, pointing the right way, and keep the heat out of the engine bay
We are hoping to see 500rwhp on lowish kinds of boost pressures < 10psi and will post the results from our Dyno Dynamics load dyno next week, along with final installation pictures
Heat in the engine bay is not that bad with a front mount. We have been running our twin kit on our test truck for 2K miles now with daily driving. No coating either.

Martin, I think what others might be concerned with is the idea of an oil pump, enough people already got hurt from the STS kits and their pumps.

RIck
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #80  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
thats how i was thinking of doing my twins as well. but im still up in air of custom logs or manis
I'm not sure if bigger turbos will fit there though. When I get my truck back I'm going to hold my turbo up in there and see. It's a PT67 so it's of decent size, but twin 67's on a 408 is plenty. I really want to know if 60-1 T3/T4 turbos would fit there.

Originally Posted by TGO2Z71
Must make a hell of a noise being right under the floor boards though!!
I know my single isn't that bad. With the factory heat shield under there, sound deadening and carpet, the engine's exhuast note is still louder. Most of the noise that makes the STS loud is the lack of a tailpipe or muffler.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.