Dragalanche-new times!
Dec 11, 2006 | 11:38 AM
#21
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Originally Posted by slowec
Allen? you there?
I didn't purposely pick this cam out, it was installed when the truck was NA. It just happened to work out well, lowend and midrange torque is what this heavy truck needs.
To be honest, it's very hard to pick a mild cam that will be bad for a turbo, just stay around the 114/115 lsa, no overlap, at least for our applications. That way, it'll build boost nicely.
We've had some nice results from the 220 cam as well, high lift, 115 lsa.
Hope that helps,
allen
Dec 11, 2006 | 11:53 AM
#22
Originally Posted by FarmTruc
hey slowec,
I didn't purposely pick this cam out, it was installed when the truck was NA. It just happened to work out well, lowend and midrange torque is what this heavy truck needs.
To be honest, it's very hard to pick a mild cam that will be bad for a turbo, just stay around the 114/115 lsa, no overlap, at least for our applications. That way, it'll build boost nicely.
We've had some nice results from the 220 cam as well, high lift, 115 lsa.
Hope that helps,
allen
I didn't purposely pick this cam out, it was installed when the truck was NA. It just happened to work out well, lowend and midrange torque is what this heavy truck needs.
To be honest, it's very hard to pick a mild cam that will be bad for a turbo, just stay around the 114/115 lsa, no overlap, at least for our applications. That way, it'll build boost nicely.
We've had some nice results from the 220 cam as well, high lift, 115 lsa.
Hope that helps,
allen
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kr1s
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
9
Aug 24, 2015 05:34 PM
smokeshow
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
Aug 23, 2015 08:23 PM
therock
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
0
Aug 23, 2015 01:37 PM
