Does running twin supercharger's make sense?

Spoolin · 2007-11-02 09:09:02

This is a bad ass twin procharged cts-v http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/features/0704gm_2005_cadiallac_cts_v/photo_03.html

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-02-2007, 12:31 PM

#11

doublenot

On The Tree

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 152

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

This is a bad *** twin procharged cts-v
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com.../photo_03.html

Reply Like

11-02-2007, 02:00 PM

#12

trever1t

2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB

iTrader: (14)

Join Date: Oct 2005

Location: NorCal

Posts: 26,690

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Hmm, my next setup? Marine apps have a great cooling advantage.

Reply Like

11-02-2007, 04:45 PM

#13

Spoolin

GFYS and STFU

Thread Starter

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Here and sometimes there too.

Posts: 13,870

Likes: 1

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Founds a few more of that particular car. Looked increadible but just overly complicated and not ideal for "easy" power.

Reply Like

11-02-2007, 04:57 PM

#14

CHEVRACER83

TECH Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: Somewhere around -199C

Posts: 7,023

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spoolin

Founds a few more of that particular car. Looked increadible but just overly complicated and not ideal for "easy" power.

I BELIEVE JUST LIKE TWIN TURBO'S YOU CAN SETUP TWIN SUPERCHARGERS, BUT THE WAY THAT SYSTEM IS SETUP IS SILLY..... THE INTERCOOLERS WILL BE ALMOST USELESS LIKE THAT... AND I WOULD PROBABLY RUN A W2A INTERCOOLER ON THAT SETUP... BUT THE TWIN ROTREX ON THAT SETUP WOULD PROBABLY BE WAY MORE AIR THAN IT NEEDS... UNLESS THEYRE REALLY SMALL HOUSINGS??