FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Anyone use Comp turbos new oil less turbos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2011, 06:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Three6GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 2,165
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default Anyone use Comp turbos new oil less turbos?

Found some pretty interesting turbos. Never really heard of Comp Turbo till I watched some of the Nelson Racing Engines videos, and when there charging 20k-40k for there engines and them making around 2000 boosted hp thought I would look into the parts they use. Well stumbled into the Comp Turbo website and have to say there stuff is pretty badass. But wouldnt expect anything less when you paying almost 3k for a single turbo. Anyone ever use one of these turbos? Being oil less they should be pretty versatile. The turbos use a high heat greese that they say lets the turbo spin alot easier and faster minimizing turbo lag.

http://www.compturbo.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Gw4U...layer_embedded






Last edited by Three6GMC; 04-03-2011 at 07:00 PM.
Old 04-04-2011, 10:24 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
PediDr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Village of Lakewood, IL
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Heavy grease?
Wonder how they compare to the Aerochargers?
Would help with midmounts or remote mounts, but the price is up there.
Old 04-05-2011, 08:27 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
OnyxSilveradoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its exciting...but you know it costs to be the boss and these are very cool for packaging, now if the parts you dont need off set the extra cost of the turbo...
Old 04-05-2011, 08:45 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Three6GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 2,165
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

That's a good question idk if the parts that wouldn't be needed would offset the price. I think you would be still more in on this then a conventional turbo system. But tO have sOmethin like this is pretty cool something you don't see very often.
Old 04-05-2011, 12:09 PM
  #5  
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

There's a thread on tech about these. They supposedly spool about 1500 rpm sooner than a billet turbo. So lets say you got a single billet 6765 to remote mount. 1200 for it, plus the oil pump and lines are what another 500 or so? I believe a 72 version of these are 2200 and would spool much quicker which would negate the remote mounting and would also have no hassle with oil feeding. I'd love to try one since it seems the remote mounted setups always make lots of torque which kind of makes me want to try a mid/remote mount setup
Old 04-05-2011, 12:45 PM
  #6  
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just called them. Very helpful and informative. They suggested a CT43 7475 rear mounted on a 402. Should spool by 2500-3000 and support up to 1000whp. Only lines I'd need to run would be water lines to cool it. T them off the heater core and no problems. Seems like a good turbo to me. Maybe I'll get to use one.
Old 04-05-2011, 01:54 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
PediDr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Village of Lakewood, IL
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by skyhighsami
Only lines I'd need to run would be water lines to cool it. T them off the heater core and no problems. Seems like a good turbo to me. Maybe I'll get to use one.
If you're that 'remote' why not just get a Bosch water pump, small radiator and reservoir?
Old 04-05-2011, 01:57 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Three6GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 2,165
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Badass man get one and report back would be really interest in the same setup on my truck. How much did they quote you on the turbo?
Old 04-05-2011, 04:24 PM
  #9  
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PediDr2
If you're that 'remote' why not just get a Bosch water pump, small radiator and reservoir?
What??
Old 04-05-2011, 05:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by skyhighsami
There's a thread on tech about these. They supposedly spool about 1500 rpm sooner than a billet turbo. So lets say you got a single billet 6765 to remote mount. 1200 for it, plus the oil pump and lines are what another 500 or so? I believe a 72 version of these are 2200 and would spool much quicker which would negate the remote mounting and would also have no hassle with oil feeding. I'd love to try one since it seems the remote mounted setups always make lots of torque which kind of makes me want to try a mid/remote mount setup
The reason they make more tq, is because everyone uses a smaller turbo on rear mounts. Then they turn up the boost and run out of turbo, which causes the tq to go so high. Same thing happens on a front mount, when you run out of turbo the tq will go way up.


Quick Reply: Anyone use Comp turbos new oil less turbos?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.