6.0 dyno #s

dlt76028 · 2009-01-10 20:53:52

i think about 62% Mine is at 61% :D

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 29, 2009 | 05:19 PM

#41

00ChevyScott

Wearin' da big hat

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 10,262

Likes: 9

From: Over There

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlt76028

i think about 62%

Mine is at 61%

Apr 30, 2009 | 12:04 AM

#42

dc_justin

Hello Dave

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,119

Likes: 3

From: San Diego, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by sargie26

What is the difference between a Dynojet... and a "Mustangdyno". I just back from my first dyno tune off a mustang dyno. it layed 393, and from what I see on the paper... 502 tq. at the wheels. Of course... The guy said on a Dynojet it would be more... Why.

Dynojet numbers are inflated: http://www.factorypro.com/magazine/d...hp_reason.html

Apr 30, 2009 | 12:18 AM

#43

blackbeast ss

Launching!

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 295

Likes: 0

From: LA AND LAS VEGAS

A dyno jet reading is 21.8% higher than actual HP/TQ numbers

A loaded dyno (dyno dynamics, mustang...) is 18.8% lower than a dyno jet but is real world numbers

Apr 30, 2009 | 08:56 AM

#44

NGA PLZ

On The Tree

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 151

Likes: 0

From: Louisiana

Its more closer to 13% b/c i know my truck isnt going to put out 370 on a dynojet.

Apr 30, 2009 | 09:36 PM

#45

sargie26

Teching In

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 32

Likes: 0

I was just wondering. I have 98 sonoma that i put a 6.0 with a cam in it. dur .050, 220 on int. and exh., 557 lift on both as well. I was talking to the guy doing my tune and he said it would be higher on the dynojet. Didn't know why... But now I do. that is why I enjoy this site. thank you...