Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

How to make my trans shift better with HP tuners?

Old Mar 22, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #1  
ASkipper's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Conway SC
Default How to make my trans shift better with HP tuners?

I have gotten HPtuners and I can not seem to find a way to make the trans shift harder.Under transmission-Auto shift properties-shift pressure-Normal&performance tables-I have adjusted the tables up gradually to my max pressure of 96.I have also adjusted the shift time tables.Still the transmission does not want to shift hard.Oh well guess it is time for a Corvette servo.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:20 AM
  #2  
BigKID's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,953
Likes: 242
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

If you have maxed out the base pressure tables with unsatisfactory results, you can also go to the 'shift pressure modifier' tables for specific up/down shifts or the force motor current table for across the board changes. Lower values in the FMC values = more commanded line pressure.
Although when you say adjusted gradually up to max, do you mean the whole table is maxed at 96 or cell1=1 and increases up to 96 at the last cell?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

shift kit and servo and then make your pressure tables stock
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #4  
RoninsDenali's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Default

Make sure your Force Motor Current table doesnt have a no-pressure setting at max commanded pressure.

Ie, something like 1100mA in the last column correlating with a 96 commanded pressure. Change that to something like 50mA (inline with the other cells in the rows) If thats the case and you are commanding max pressure, its a invitation to fry your tranny
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #5  
white1's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 5
From: Sittin on jackstands
Default

Pulling the torque management will firm it up a little too
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:58 PM
  #6  
rgvsierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: RGV, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by RoninsDenali
Make sure your Force Motor Current table doesnt have a no-pressure setting at max commanded pressure.

Ie, something like 1100mA in the last column correlating with a 96 commanded pressure. Change that to something like 50mA (inline with the other cells in the rows) If thats the case and you are commanding max pressure, its a invitation to fry your tranny
i didnt quite understand that, do you mean to keep the last row in the force motor table a high value like the stock one 1096 or put in a value like the previous row of say 98..
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
RoninsDenali's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Default

Put the last row something small... Like the previous column, or taper it to be a "little" smaller.

Basically the way the FMC table works, is that the higher the current flowing to the control solenoid yeilds lower line pressure. GM setup the stock table with the last column being a "failsafe" current load. And they could get away with it as their tuning never utilized the max commanded pressure. However, once you get your hands in there, that high value is bad, very bad. Think of it this way, WOT shift, max pressure, but to the PCM the commanded pressure is pratcially nothing. Bye bye tranny.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #8  
Zick's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by dewmanshu
shift kit and servo and then make your pressure tables stock
I'm really thinking about going this route as well. I have been playing with my trans tables for the last month and just cannot find the sweet spot.
I wouldn't play around with the force motor table too much, seemed to cause me more problem then it was worth. I'm back to the stock table there with mine.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #9  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Zick
I'm really thinking about going this route as well. I have been playing with my trans tables for the last month and just cannot find the sweet spot.
I wouldn't play around with the force motor table too much, seemed to cause me more problem then it was worth. I'm back to the stock table there with mine.
waaaaaaaaay to many horror stories on the web and threads of people roasting the STOCK trannies screwing those force motor tables. Let alone super hard to find that sweet spot. If you are good at and know what your doing obviously that's one thing.

IMHO it's easier to fry you tranny screwing with those tables than it is blowing your motor screwing with your advance table. At least you'll get knock retard and pull back...the tranny will just fry...no warning.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #10  
RoninsDenali's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Default

dwmanshu, the same can be said with those who command max line pressure at on their pressure tables without atleast replacing the last column of the force motor current table with something that wont result in zero pressure. Still yield a blown tranny.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.