THE TRUCK STOP General Chat area. Religion and politics topics will undoubtedly be deleted. Anything over PG-13 is not allowed. WORK SAFE!

Why Quick is always right and the world is always wrong...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:40 AM
  #171  
1LOW4X4's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Texas
Default

Originally Posted by A Low Dime
Since his sponsors make him, he will then just suggest +4 platinum bosch spark plugs and a tuner to take care of it.
Lol how about myth busters or jay lenos team of builders
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:41 AM
  #172  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
MAYBE if the engine bay were sealed this would be true. There is a constant supply of air under the hood of a vehicle, there is no way twin turbos could draw enough air to create the phenomenon he is claiming.
you guys are actually making it out more then i orginally stated but of course its over your head

you would be much better off with turbos not facing eachother then facing eachother. especially using tiny filters as orignally stated

the black hole statment is where smokeshow stated
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:44 AM
  #173  
BigRed Cummins's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
you guys are actually making it out more then i orginally stated but of course its over your head

you would be much better off with turbos not facing eachother then facing eachother. especially using tiny filters as orignally stated

the black hole statment is where smokeshow stated
Its just that you don't get that there is no way in holy hell that they are going to consume enough air underneath your hood, to "fight each other for air."
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:44 AM
  #174  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
again there sweetheart reading is eay when you have "hooked on phonics" this is the 4th time you poorly read a post. i said he put before he added his cam he put down better numbers then you did. O btw that was on much lower psi as in 10. Go pay a visit to his post on RGV.... but im sure youll say those guys are full of it since a big time shop like out in cali didnt build it
you cannot even keep your bullshit straight......Classic.

I have plenty of respect for Glock and his accomplishments, there is no need to bring him into this. You claim to be a "hands on guy" go get a stock 2005 truck with a 4.8, bolt a turbo on it, set the system at 10 psi and show us the dyno sheet that reads 500 HP. I would believe 400, MAYBE 410.....but 500+ is a bit far fetched.

For your information my trucks baseline was 220 RWHP and was tested on the same dyno a day later. That would be a 160 HP gain, again on a stock motor, through the stock manifolds and stock muffler....using the stock air box. I dont care who you are, that is a great gain for 5 hours worth of work, and yes I installed it all by myself.

I will take $37.00 per HP gained any day of the week. At the end of the day, most will spend that or more on a GOOD turbo kit that has the fit and finish MOST expect. I can almost guarantee you of that.
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:44 AM
  #175  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Haha, we've provided several different analogies that disprove your claim, but you pay no attention to them. There's just no getting to someone so ignorant. You'll argue this until your fingers bleed, even if you know you're dead wrong. What a shame.
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:46 AM
  #176  
dlt76028's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
funny is i ran faster then your truck with less mods and years ago. You sold your truck and i had to correct alot of the **** ups you had going on. So before you go try and attack my truck which isnt a track setup by no means try and make something fast yourself.
Thats weird cuz he still hasn't ran faster then my n/a time... and when did you have a cam 6.0 run 12 flat??
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:48 AM
  #177  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
you cannot even keep your bullshit straight......Classic.

I have plenty of respect for Glock and his accomplishments, there is no need to bring him into this. You claim to be a "hands on guy" go get a stock 2005 truck with a 4.8, bolt a turbo on it, set the system at 10 psi and show us the dyno sheet that reads 500 HP. I would believe 400, MAYBE 410.....but 500+ is a bit far fetched.

For your information my trucks baseline was 220 RWHP and was tested on the same dyno a day later. That would be a 160 HP gain, again on a stock motor, through the stock manifolds and stock muffler....using the stock air box. I dont care who you are, that is a great gain for 5 hours worth of work, and yes I installed it all by myself.

I will take $37.00 per HP gained any day of the week. At the end of the day, most will spend that or more on a GOOD turbo kit that has the fit and finish MOST expect. I can almost guarantee you of that.
Kbracing kit for a 70mm turbo is what 3k? injectors, tune and pump and youre well over 500 rwhp for under 6500 bucks

hell look at foose and his results on a 4.8 another proven example
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:49 AM
  #178  
1LOW4X4's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Texas
Default

I gotta hit the sack, somebody text me on who gets banned
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #179  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

WOW, this thread is just awesome!
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:51 AM
  #180  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
Kbracing kit for a 70mm turbo is what 3k? injectors, tune and pump and youre well over 500 rwhp for under 6500 bucks

hell look at foose and his results on a 4.8 another proven example
Sorry dude, you are not going to bolt a turbo on a 4.8 and add 280 HP */- @ 10 psi. I like KB, Trick, Nelson, all of the above, but even they will tell you that is a bit far fetched.

Again, if you are the great tuner, and awesome wrench you claim you are.....go do it and prove it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.