THE TRUCK STOP General Chat area. Religion and politics topics will undoubtedly be deleted. Anything over PG-13 is not allowed. WORK SAFE!

GM bankrupt close 12 plants / obama 30 billion bail out for gm

Old Jun 2, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #41  
JAVI05's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
Default

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc
I am brand loyal, but it is gms own fault. Which is the result of the big ceo's exc that don't really give a **** about the car comp, but the money that they can stuff in there pockets imo. I hope they make a fast recoup, start to see wtf is going on...
me too.. and your 100% right about this being gm's fault!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #42  
terravast4's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 344
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JAVI05
where do you guys get your info. last thing i read was obama wanted nothing in running gm. just help them get back on their feet. thats what i understood and still do... some of you guys are hearing things or just stating crap. some of yall also make it seem like obama made gm go under and all this is his plan to take over gm.?
I got my info from reading the good old fashioned newspaper about two weeks ago. The government forced the gm ceo to retire. This was part of the terms of the bailout. it said there right in black and white the intentions of the government and how they plan to run gm. we are going to have a hanful of cars to choose from and none of the will be anywhere close to being a performance type of vehicle. If you don't believe..............just wait and see.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2009 | 08:59 PM
  #43  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Money Week Magazine May 18, 2006
...In America, some large corporations face bankruptcy because of their pension fund liabilities – in the case of General Motors these are three times the value of its shares. Congress is currently hammering out a new law to force companies to fund their pension promises and pay more in premiums to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which has a $23 billion deficit.
Think about this, just for one sec. In 2006 their pension liability was THREE times the value of its stock price. I'll save you the yahoo finance search, their stock was $24.68 May 15, 2006. I can promise you one thing for sure, their pension liability has not decreased, it has went up AND it is highly rare and unlikely due to many acts of congress that those pensions will get terminated in the first bankruptcy. Yeah, I said first, you actually think they can handle paying back the stock holders AND future/current retirees...OH and still break even.

$23 Billion deficit in 2006. $30 Billion Obama loan in 2009.

Originally Posted by Brookings.edu May 29, 2009
GM has made pension promises costing approximately $100 billion in today’s dollars. Unfortunately, the investments in its pension funds are worth about $20 billion less than the obligations, according to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).
Without going into much of my anti-union and large corporate exec hog bashing session (they have done their good for a long time), I point the above items out because they are the writing on the bathroom wall. You can paint over them all you want, but they will eventually bleed through. And there you'll be taking a dump and you'll see it again..."GM has pention liabilities for 266,000 retirees yet they only have 120,000 employed to help fund the pension...which by the way is down 46% just like YOUR 401K." Social Security anybody? OH yeah...they control that too.

I don't have answers, and I can't imagine telling 266,000 people to go home because they no longer have jobs....but that won't happen on that large of a scale IMO. I can't stop thinking that I could certainly find a better place in our country right now to spend 30 billion and make it count. If not me at least a couple NON-party related economists.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 06:55 AM
  #44  
buzzkillwill's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

GM and the union's made their bed, now they must lie in it. Sorry to those that are, or will lose their jobs, but you have to know that if you chose to work for a company, a contractor or sub-contractor that has been going under for 20 years, the gig won't last forever.
GM (and the other big 2 also) were too busy paying attention to the union's needs and not the CONSUMER! And during that time the consumer was being paid attention to, by the IMPORTS. And like any big US company, GM, Ford and Chrysler were slow to change and were way behind the curve and realibility, consumer needs and technology, which is why they are, where they are.

As for the government, I read an article the other day about the person who's been tasked BY OBAMA to right the GM ship. This guy is a GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. Now here's the part that worries me, the Obama administration had a plan in place for US auto industry BEFORE HE EVEN WAS ELECTED! This has been the plan since day one.
That scares me. Obama hasn't taken down the largest industy in the US, but he helped perpetuate (sp) it's demise. He planned it and it's playing out the way he wanted it to.
Having the government the primary share holder worries me, and if GM can find a way to rectify that, they will come out a better, stronger, leaner company. The thing is, the US auto industry HAS caught up to Toyota and Honda. They are making better vehicles, more consumer driven.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 06:37 PM
  #45  
fastnblu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
...
I'm not depending on my company to provide for my retirement, I'm taking care of that myself. ...
No one will look out for u better than u. 401K, etc. It sucks when 401K (& other investments) is in crapper. I remember thinking 10-20 yrs ago, a scary future awaits (jobwise, uncertainty in life,...). Scary ****!

Originally Posted by LowBlack99
...the uncertainty of GM has been scaring consumers from purchasing GM products. ...It is however a inconvenience for some customers who will have to drive farther to have there vehicle serviced.

...GM was way to slow to react to the import market and build quality vehicles people wanted to own that were stylish and dependable...Simply put GM is and has been way out of touch with what made it the American icon it was and they still don't realize it IMO.
The scared/ inconvenienced consumers; consumers always lose. I'm curious how old some of you guys are. I'm not getting into the UAW killed or didn't. I know I implied the part bout GM slow to react( think:elephant) it takes a LONG time to slow em down, but once they're rollin, they do alright. Point:they waited to long to make some econoboxes. Imports (it's their bread/ butter.

Originally Posted by Jeteys5.3
yeah but heres the problem. They get everything free, full benefits, full healthcare without paying a dime. Who else gets that? nobody i know of.
I'm not jealous of them, are you?

Originally Posted by terravast4
The problem is that america used to be a huge exporter of american made goods. In the 70's and 80's we started importing more and more goods from other countries and it just snowballed fron there. America produces very little now days and almost all of our imports are from China and Japan. Not only is this bad for the auto industry but but for our economy and our future as a world leader. ...
You nailed it!

Originally Posted by Jeteys5.3
Yep true. How can we be somebody when we don't even produce **** anymore? we have just sent it all overseas. how can we create a thriving economy like that?
+2. Part of the reason we were viewed how we were (are), the U.S. was (is) an economic powerhouse. For such a young country, a bit over 200 yrs, a economic tour-de-force.

Originally Posted by Jeteys5.3
yes they will. They want little gas saving POS cars and thats what they will push.
I don't mind savin fuel, but no POS!

Originally Posted by terravast4
...we are going to have a handful of cars to choose from and none of the will be anywhere close to being a performance type of vehicle. ...
A shame if true.

Originally Posted by dewmanshu
Without going into much of my anti-union and large corporate exec hog bashing session (they have done their good for a long time), I point the above items out because they are the writing on the bathroom wall. You can paint over them all you want, but they will eventually bleed through. And there you'll be taking a dump and you'll see it again...Social Security anybody? OH yeah...they control that too.

I don't have answers, and I can't imagine telling 266,000 people to go home because they no longer have jobs...I can't stop thinking that I could certainly find a better place in our country right now to spend 30 billion and make it count.
A true Dewey-ism. You takin a dump & ...

Originally Posted by buzzkillwill
...Sorry to those that are, or will lose their jobs, but you have to know that if you chose to work for a company, a contractor or sub-contractor that has been going under for 20 years, the gig won't last forever.
GM (and the other big 2 also) were too busy paying attention to the union's needs and not the CONSUMER! And during that time the consumer was being paid attention to, by the IMPORTS. And like any big US company, GM, Ford and Chrysler were slow to change and were way behind the curve and realibility, consumer needs and technology, which is why they are, where they are.

As for the government, I read an article the other day about the person who's been tasked BY OBAMA to right the GM ship. This guy is a GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. Now here's the part that worries me, the Obama administration had a plan in place for US auto industry BEFORE HE EVEN WAS ELECTED! This has been the plan since day one.
That scares me. Obama hasn't taken down the largest industy in the US, but he helped perpetuate (sp) it's demise. He planned it and it's playing out the way he wanted it to.
Having the government the primary share holder worries me, and if GM can find a way to rectify that, they will come out a better, stronger, leaner company. The thing is, the US auto industry HAS caught up to Toyota and Honda. They are making better vehicles, more consumer driven.
Yes, I'm sorry for them. I hate to see anyone lose their job, in any industry, whether I know them or not. Yes, the Imports paid attn where it was due - consumers. True, we caught & in some instances passed. Our quality is there. If in doubt, Caddy beat Lexus in satisfaction.

That plan in place from Day 1/ workin out how he wanted - I certainly hope that is B.S. If not, OH ****!

Last edited by fastnblu; Jun 3, 2009 at 06:44 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vortec350ss
Drag Racing
134
Jan 12, 2016 10:36 PM
00loudchevy
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
3
Dec 3, 2015 05:54 PM
Avalanche2002
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
7
Nov 30, 2015 07:31 AM
94f150
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
0
Sep 28, 2015 05:28 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.