Bout to wire up subs, quick question
#1
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
I had a quick and prob easy question but just wanted to get input on it. I am about to install my ARC audio subs which are each dual 4 ohm subs. The amp that i will be using is a Cadence Z9000 which puts out the power like this.
4 Ohm Stereo Power-- 2 x 300 Watts
2 Ohm Stereo Power-- 2 x 400 Watts
4 Ohm Bridged Power-- 1 x 800 Watts
Now should I wire the subs in series then parrallel them to get a 4ohm load and run it at bridged power or should I just run each sub parrallel into a 2ohm load and hook into each channel? Its been a while with car audio so i could just be completely off to begin with.
4 Ohm Stereo Power-- 2 x 300 Watts
2 Ohm Stereo Power-- 2 x 400 Watts
4 Ohm Bridged Power-- 1 x 800 Watts
Now should I wire the subs in series then parrallel them to get a 4ohm load and run it at bridged power or should I just run each sub parrallel into a 2ohm load and hook into each channel? Its been a while with car audio so i could just be completely off to begin with.
#2
If it were me, I'd wire it like this:
Wire the voice coils on each single sub in series effectively making each sub a single 8 Ohm sub. Then wire those two together in parallel, this should present a single 4 Ohm load to your amp. Run your amp in bridged mode. You give up having two separate channels of bass music, but you gain headroom.
Wire the voice coils on each single sub in series effectively making each sub a single 8 Ohm sub. Then wire those two together in parallel, this should present a single 4 Ohm load to your amp. Run your amp in bridged mode. You give up having two separate channels of bass music, but you gain headroom.
#5
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
ok its going in a subthump box so it is divided. i guess i'm just going to have to mess with it and see what sounds better because it seems everyone has their own ideas on which is better yet some say its the same, and others say, bridged is better or seperate channels are better. But either way I will be getting around 400wrms to each sub correct?
#6
Originally Posted by fox_forma
But either way I will be getting around 400wrms to each sub correct?
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by jmproductions
That's correct. You're pushing the amp in pretty much the same manner no matter which way you go. The difference is one way puts the subs in stereo the other does not. Personally I would bridge the amp and run them mono because I think there might be less of a possibility of phasing issues. Either way the results should be pretty similar.
I like the way you think. I would also keep in mind that you will be cutting the low pass at ~150Hz (I hope) there by giving the amp additional headroom from the start (in a way). Many low pass x-overs will force the signal into mono anyway so either way will be fine. Phasing issues will be minimal...unless you wire the subs incorrectly and go 180* out of phase in stereo. I would find an active low pass x-over with at least a 24dB Octave slope and run her in Mono.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Three6GMC
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
16
Aug 28, 2015 07:56 AM




