INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

quick cam question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2007, 10:32 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
litreddevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: From Houma La. Living n Ellisville Miss.
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i wouls stay with the 224
Old 01-13-2007, 12:28 PM
  #12  
9 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
tarinitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odessa Texas
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I still can but can I ask why. The 224 works pretty good on my 5.3 but I thought it wouldn't be as good for the 6.0.
Old 01-13-2007, 12:51 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Frito Bandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say stick with the 224. I remember reading that you want more low end than your 5.3 has with that cam. If you re-use your cam in your 6.0 (which is 40" bigger) it should have substantially more torque down low while still having a strong top end. Basically I think your current cam will suite your purpose just fine and the money for another cam could be better spent elsewhere.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jake75
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
08-05-2015 01:26 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
08-01-2015 07:45 AM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
07-26-2015 10:57 PM
low2001gmc
GM Parts Classifieds
0
07-23-2015 05:10 PM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
07-21-2015 06:59 PM



Quick Reply: quick cam question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.