INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

quick cam question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #11  
litreddevil's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 1
From: From Houma La. Living n Ellisville Miss.
Default

i wouls stay with the 224
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #12  
tarinitup's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 1
From: Odessa Texas
Default

I still can but can I ask why. The 224 works pretty good on my 5.3 but I thought it wouldn't be as good for the 6.0.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #13  
Frito Bandito's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Odessa, Texas
Default

I say stick with the 224. I remember reading that you want more low end than your 5.3 has with that cam. If you re-use your cam in your 6.0 (which is 40" bigger) it should have substantially more torque down low while still having a strong top end. Basically I think your current cam will suite your purpose just fine and the money for another cam could be better spent elsewhere.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jake75
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
Aug 5, 2015 01:26 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Jul 26, 2015 10:57 PM
low2001gmc
GM Parts Classifieds
0
Jul 23, 2015 05:10 PM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.