Wow, you can read.

 

I assumed you were referring to a 327 which is 2 cubic inches less than a 329

 

I assumed you could read, maybe you can't.

 

Yes I understand what you were getting at now. I'm pretty sure my first comment was in no way rude. If you have to be a douche about it then I guess do as you feel necessary.

 

I've looked at this myself based more on the old DZ302 formula than the 327 and it seems like it would be a DZ329...could be a beast.

 

There's a little bit more to the equation than just total displacement. I'd prefer a 32x cube engine in a way over-square configuaration (4" bore x 3.26" stroke) than the 5.3's configuration (3.78" bore x 3.62" stroke), but that's just me.

Not that I'm advocating spends tons of money on less cubes, but it would be a pretty killer short stroke engine. You could use L92 heads and intake but rev the sucker to the moon, making mondo power at the same time.

 

Yeah,..............but this one goes to eleven. Let's argue about something important like how many chocolate chips are in a chips a hoy cookie. bring it.

 

1000 in every bag...

 

998, which is two less. duh! everyone knows that

 

: